|
Glorious
Noise Returns
Commentary: In the spirit of the '70s,
the conceptual sound blend of rock
with classical makes a new splash in Sonic Youth.
By MARK SWED
Sunday, December 12, 1999
Around
20 years ago, at a festival of new music in downtown New York, Brian Eno
characterized experimental classical music as a laboratory for pop. And
there was no question that the late '70s in SoHo and TriBeCa were a rare
time and place. A shared avant-garde sensibility made boundaries between
classical and pop more porous than ever.
Noise was noise, and everyone at the time wanted to make some. Serious
composers with conservatory training erected walls of loudly amplified
guitar sounds in alternative concert spaces. Serious composers with art-school
backgrounds erected walls of loudly amplified guitar sounds in loft spaces.
Art rockers with art-school backgrounds did much the same thing, if less
formally and with fewer guitars, in "no-wave" dance clubs. Interaction
between popular music and art music was, of course, not new--there has
always been pop music that has drawn on classical music, and classical
music that has drawn on pop music. But this was a unique moment when experimental
pop musicians and experimental classical composers spoke the same language,
whatever their training or background. Glenn Branca's symphonies made
with deafening banks of electric guitars could be called art rock or rocking
art.
The artistic fling didn't last long, but out of that post-punk environment
came a band with a particular devotion to exploring the riches of noise.
It was Sonic Youth, which went on to have something of a mainstream career
for a while (and proved to be a significant influence on the next big
rock trend, grunge), but it never completely lost its indie experimental
roots.
Now Sonic Youth, in the fourth volume of a series of recordings waving
goodbye to the 20th century, has decided to explore those roots in a new
two-CD set the band has produced on its own label, SYR. Those roots happen
to be the classic high-modernist avant-garde of John Cage and the school
that developed around him, and this recording of conceptual pieces from
the past 40 years is startling. I have never known pop musicians to play
classical music--be it new or old--so convincingly, without either pretense
or trepidation but simply as if it were their own.
Pop musicians have many different motivations for turning to classical
music and different ways of doing it. There is the occasional seasoned
rocker who, finding that middle age quells rebellion, loses an enthusiasm
for extending the party indefinitely and seeks more refined means of expression.
But often that desire, genuine as it might be, will only serve to point
up the rocker's musical limitations.
* * * For instance, Paul McCartney has released his third classical CD,
"Working Classical" (EMI Classics). These short, agreeable pieces
of chamber and orchestral music, cobbled together with the help of a noted
composer, Richard Rodney Bennett, and Broadway orchestrator, Jonathan
Tunick, suit the former Beatle's lyric gifts more gracefully than did
his lumbering "Liverpool Oratorio" or monumental orchestral
score, "Standing Stone." Still, the nostalgic pieces (some in
memory of his late wife, Linda) are so blatantly sentimental that classical
music comes to seem a vehicle for indulging McCartney's mushy soft side.
Joe Jackson, who has just produced a major 45-minute symphony on Sony
Classical, is another veteran British rock star (though a generation younger
than McCartney) looking for musical substance. Jackson had a traditional,
if uneasy, musical training, studying composition at the Royal Academy
of Music in London. But he indicates in his newly published coming-of-age
memoir, "A Cure for Gravity," that he felt the academic new
music of the early '70s neither satisfied his rebellious spirit nor his
communicative urge the way popular song did.
Unlike McCartney, a now older and wiser Jackson has attempted in his Symphony
No. 1 to apply symphonic form to pop music materials. He uses an excellent
band of 10 players--which includes jazz trumpeter Terence Blanchard, new
music violinist Mary Rowell and Jackson on keyboards--to develop song-like
ideas in traditionally symphonic ways. But he seldom reveals the invention
needed to successfully control large structures. Simple and direct phrases
may be engaging in themselves but are dull on expansion. Worse, he hasn't
produced the depth of sonic interest that characterizes good modern symphonic
music--Jackson's electronic samples, in particular, are trite and dated.
Even the catchy finale is ultimately as corny as McCartney.
Corny Sonic Youth is not. Vast is its aural imagination, and, ironically,
it is these younger (but no longer young) musicians (the band was formed
in 1981) who have the most to say about the rebellious '60s and '70s.
Here the four-member band has turned to some of the leading sonic adventurers
of our time (and recent past). The discs contain performances of two important
pieces, "Edges" and "Burdocks," by Christian Wolff,
perhaps the most successful of post-Cagean conceptualists, with Wolff
joining in. Pauline Oliveros, a pioneer in a kind of meditative, intuitive
improvisation, has written a new piece for the album. Takehisa Kosugi,
the music director of the Merce Cunningham Dance Company, makes a guest
appearance in his "+ -" and makes a lot of characteristically
fascinating amplified racket. The band tackles one of John Cage's last
pieces, "Four6 " aided by outstanding Bay Area percussionist
William Winant, who participated in the work's premiere and who helped
produce the recording.
Included, too, are examples from Fluxus, the art movement developed in
the 1960s by such plucky Cageans as Nam June Paik and Yoko Ono. Ono's
1961 "Voice Piece for Soprano," a 12-second scream, is here.
So is Piano Piece #13, by Fluxus "chairman" George Maciunas,
in which the band members hammer nails onto the keys of a piano, creating
music that is festive and disturbing at the same time. Uncategorizable
is a witty percussion piece by the late L.A. musicologist and composer
Nicolas Slonimsky, along with a mesmerizing percussion piece by James
Tenney (who joins the CalArts faculty in the fall). Steve Reich's "Pendulum
Music" from 1968 gets a riotous workout.
There is, in fact, no better single anthology representation of conceptual
American music (along with one brief British example by Cornelius Cardew)
currently available.
* * * But what really distinguishes these CDs is Sonic Youth's musical
and timbral insight. Much of this music is written as a set of instructions
and requires creativity, seriousness and skill to realize in an interesting
fashion. Cage's "Four6 " asks the players to come up with 12
sounds of their own choosing as the raw material of the piece. Wolff's
"Burdocks" instructs the ensemble to interact with soft sounds
in various communal ways.
A rock band is not a natural for music in which activities are proposed
for producing new sounds and combinations of sounds not otherwise dreamt
of. The musicians tend to know one another too well and interact in predictable
ways. Their guitars, percussion and untrained voices, along with relentless
same-level dynamics, further limit variety. Yet Sonic Youth sounds as
if it has made a science of exploring the unsuspected possibilities of
their musical instruments and electronic devices. Its use of feedback
alone is miraculous, revealing unsuspected richness and color in its exotic
sonic depths.
There is also no doubt that the players take this music very seriously.
But being the kind of rockers they are, they're not about to actually
tell us what they are up to. The packaging is minimal and contains no
notes, no explanations. One CD does have an embedded video, watchable
on a computer, of the band driving nails into a piano in the Maciunas,
but otherwise an innocent listener will have no idea of how the music
is produced and what is intended by it. And once again, that's a revolutionary
first.
Conceptual music (like conceptual art) begs explanation by its very nature,
and usually gets it. But the ear can be so influenced (positively or negatively)
by the intellectual arguments that the musical experience is compromised.
Sonic Youth bravely says, no, it is the music that is interesting, just
listen.
These works are part of a difficult and mostly misunderstood aspect of
American music. You can regularly encounter conceptual art at the Museum
of Contemporary Art but rarely if ever can you hear analogous conceptual
music up the block at the Performing Arts Center. So the fact that a rock
band has managed to serve it so well is nothing less than a watershed
in the peculiar dance between high art and low that popular music now
and then attempts.
- - -
Mark Swed Is The Times' Music Critic
Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times
|