|
SONICTALK
(New York, December 15, 1988)
interview by Robert Fischer
Fragmented Stories
RF: This ... electric urban folk music we are loving ... has a lot to
do with telling stories ... traditional folk music was about telling stories
on history, psychology, hygienic topics, initiation patterns ... for people
which could not read ... These stories where usually made up in a very
linear or chronological way. Somewhen during the 60es this kind of story-telling
started to change. The story-line got scattered, a new kind of lyrics
that was based on a mixture of catchphrases and impressionist "poetry"
appeared. The influence of jazz-talk and jive. Dylan was very good at
that ... Amphetamine, scatter-brained, surrealist fast talk ... Country-music
kept up the traditional narrative lines in its songs; Rock started to
develop new ways of telling stories -- maybe or probably with the beginning
of the drug-culture. At the end of the 70ies/beginning of the 80es appeared
a kind of literate, nearly academic Rockandroll- storytelling: Patty Smith,
Tom Verlaine or Richard Hell; and then Lydia Lunch, Exene Cervenka, Jeffrey
Lee Pierce, Chris D. and now Henry Rollins or Michael Stipe. This new
Rockandroll literature and poetry has now established its identity ...
What kind of stories is SONIC YOUTH telling ?
Kim: They are quite ... abstract ... stories.
RF: Do you think there are new ways of telling stories ?
Kim: Today everything is so isolated. If you take a story like a ... soap
opera on TV .. and right after that you hear in the news that 80ī000 people
died in a an earth quake ... you know that the one story is a news story
and that itīs probably true, but right after that you have this fantasy
stuff ...
TM: ... I donīt think that we tell stories ...
Kim: Because of
the way we live ... this incredible input of information ... simultaneously
... You know what happens all over the world instantly because there is
this large communication net ... It doesnīt give you a greater sense of
reality ! But mostly things are not progressing forward. The ARE no real
stories anymore. It is all fragmented ... like the news.
RF: The early story-telling on songs was because people couldnt read and
they needed and got information that way ... Now everybody in the industrial
world can read -- and everybody looks to TV and listens to the radio.
The 60es was the beginning of the media age and that is when story-telling
started to change ...
TM: ... we are not electric urban folk music ...
RF: In Country Music, traditional, straight Story-Telling remained ...
Lee: ... Country
Music today is absolutely anachronistic ... it is not a modern form anymore.
Kim: .. probably they stayed in that mould because in that way they can
reclaim a sense of .. history ...
Lee: ... to calm down our crazy world ... But in a way there is so many
stories around now. Every way you turn there is another story ... Current
music isnīt telling stories in the same way. Today it is a fractured narratives
kind of thing.
Kim: .. you donīt
have time for the full story ...
Lee: Well at one point you have a story that is true -- you have a catastrophy
on the news and the next story is soap opera and that is not true. At
a certain point they get blended ...
Kim: ... this is the way people get their sense of history ... That is
one personsī representation of history.
RF: The idea of reality is completely biased ... Now, in the band, three
of you sing and make songs ... so each of you has his own stories to tell
...
Kim: ... yes, we all have our projections.
TM: ... Iīm not
interested in stories ...
Kim: Thurston weeps
!
Lee: What do you do ?!
RF: Thurston doesnīt
tell stories ...
Kim: ... heīs got
a big spinning wheel upstairs ...
TM: I am looking
for stories !
Lee: ... for stores ?
RF: So one of the reasons why I started here is because I try to find
a form for this book, for these talks ...
TM: The thing is, we donīt want to know what we do ... (...)
RF: ???
Lee: Why, youīve got a secret ? (...)
RF: Thruston says
that the group doesnīt want to know ...
TM: ... you know,
itīs like the dreaded third album.
Lee: I thought it was the second album that is the dreaded album?
RF: ???
Lee: ... The second album is usually not very good ...
TM: The second album
is the one when you actually come to terms and you find out who you are
... and ... the third one is usually a failure because you know who you
are ...
Lee: You know who you are ...
TM: ... see, we
are all failures ...
Lee: Usually the second album is the classical failure !
TM: Yeah, the second one is the one in which you know what you can produce
... like, the first album is like a conception ... the second album is
the pregnancy and the third album is the birth ... which is the failure
! And anything that goes after that is like ... walking with the cross
...
RF: I think that failure is an anachronistic concept !
TM: I donīt know
too much about concepts of anachronism ...
Lee: What do you
mean: anachronistic ?!
RF: ... eeh ... obsolete, outdated !
Lee: Failure is obsolete ?
RF: ... in a fragmented world. Failure has a meaning in a dualistic world,
in a world caught between two opposites -- like succes or failure; win
or loose aso. -- in a world that is functions according linear, causal
structures; in which you are something because you did something else
before that induced what you are right now. In the present, fragmented
world these concepts are not relevant anymore: to loose is a good as to
win ... theoretically ... "Before" does not count anymore. You live only
the present. There is no past, there is no future anymore.
TM: HaHaHa ! Church of the Scatterbrained
RF: ... yeah, well
... We have new concepts of reality: nothing is real anymore
TM: ?!
Lee: You are shattering his reality !
Kim: ... This is probably where individual projections come in ... because
.. every individual has an illusion of ... makes up his own illusion of
living, of existence. Within this whole fragmentation ... And that is
how people exist day to day. Otherwise you couldnīt possibly function
...
Lee: I think that talking about reality this early in the relationship
is going to bed too soon ...
Kim: Itīs good to get it over ...
RF: (...) ... so this brings us back to storytelling; to the story each
individual has to tell ... He can only tell his own story, because this
is the only one that is real ... (...)
TM: But how do you know that the storyteller is actually telling the story
of himself ?
Lee: ... Because he canīt tell anything else ...
TM: ... The stories that he tells about himself are usually the story
of what he sees in the mirror ... and thatīs not really him ...
Kim: But thatīs
part of him !
TM: No ! Thatīs the fucking mirror, thatīs not him ...
Lee: What he sees in the mirrir is what HE sees ... thatīs him ! He is
the one that is doing the seeing.
TM: ... Did you
know that there is band called "Blanket of Secrecy" that had an album
called "Walls have ears", Ha !
Lee: Fragmentation !? Itīs happening right in front of your eyes ... Fragmentated
narratives !
RF: Scatterbrained
!
Lee: The Man in The Mirror ...
TM: There is much
to be said about scatterbrain !
Lee: Ha ! Yeah, you mean the "Church of the Scatterbrained" !
Kim: ... THAT is Thurstonīs philosophy ... (...) I think that we are making
TWO interviews (...) Logistics of Interviews
Lee: Yeah. Sometimes this happens when we do interviews ... where an interviewer
wants to do his questionning in a certain ... along a certain path ...
and sometimes, if itīs niot the paths along wich you are feeling at the
moment or not something you feel easy ... or, sometimes, certain things
are easy to talk about and sometimes they are not and it depends it dep4ends
on everyones mood ... and sometimes when an interviewers comes in -- ok,
this is not an interview -- but sometimes when an interviewer comes in
with a tape-recorder and start asking questions and we do what we just
did with you ... they get very upset and leave thinking that we are saying
"Fuck you" to them or someting like that ... but it is not necessarily
that at all .. it the difficulty of idscussing some of these thgings in
a rational way and like what Thruston was saying before about -- I donīt
even know what he was saying -- but he was implying that we donīt want
to know what we do in terms that we want to keep a lot of it as intuitive
as possible ... and not ... you have to be in the very right moment ...
to be able to talk analytically aboput what we do .. because usually we
tend to resist it because we feel like to uncover too much of it ... is
to ruin it ...
Kim: ... is to die ...
Lee: ... yeah, ... is to die ... in a sense.
RF: Well ... it is just difficult to walk and having everybody talking
and I just have one tape recorder !
Lee: Yeah. Maybe we should have lots of tape recorders ! Yes, and in a
way it should be an indication of how this book should go ... because
this the way we operate, and this is the good AND the bad of our group
... that everyone is shooting off in different directions at once and
... on the occasions when it combines ... then it works. But thatīs sort
of the ... template ... of the way that we work ! Pinkisī TV (with RF
crawling in between pieces of fragmented reality)
RF: You wouldnīt do any ... private interviews ?
TM: No ... Talk to the band only ... I really not worthy of a private
interview.
RF: Is that like ... amoebic life: severe them, they multiply ? As part
of the band, you have a collective Ego ...
TM: ... We ... ah ... donīt have Egos ...
Lee: HaHa ! RF: The band has a collective Self ...
Lee: ... Igloos ...
TM: ... Egos are very beautiful ... I lost my Ego.
Lee: Now film these guys right now, talking !
RF: Can you have
one ... in a band ?!
TM: I desperately
want an Ego ... I mean, I would gladly talk to you ... if I had an Ego.
I think part of the problem is an unresolved desire to have an Ego.
RF: Well ... it is easier to talk if you donīt have an Ego ?
TM: It is easier to talk with a parka on ... than without one ... I would
think.
RF: It is easier to GIVE interviews with an interview with an Ego ...
but not to talk. (...)
TM: See, Iīm just a 30 year old Stringbean from Alabama and ... I have
absolutely no ... philosophical input to anybody. (...) What makes you
think that I am in a position to employ any ... kind of ... like ... (...)
Voices and Noise in the Background.
RF: Aah ... Could you please give me a break !
TM: Do you think
that I am posing as a teenager !?
Lee: Give you a break ???
RF: I donīt think itīs funny ... This is work ... ARBEIT ! Freedom.
TM: ... Only freedom can defend me ...
RF: Only freedom
can defend me ?
TM: You know who wrote that ?
Lee: Who ?
TM: Greg Ginn, Teenage Philosopher.
RF: Teenage Philosopher ? (...) I think I am sitting on the microphone
... Hmmm ... Yes, I think that anybody can expand on his ... doings. I
am not here for the philosophy ... I want to hear stories !
Lee: Stories ?!
TM: Like Springsteen ?
RF: I dont like his stories because they dont relate to my life.
TM: So you think that mine may ?
RF: If I go from
the music, I would say so.
TM: I tell you that
Springsteen tells more interesting stories than I do.
Lee: Well ... Why donīt you tell a story of your youth ! ... smoking pot
behind the science wing ... Thurstonsī Youth
TM: One time I sneaked into the Art Class ... in my High School, with
another friend ... and we stole this big boards and we were walking to
the hall ways were all the classes were in sessions ... and in the cafeteria-
studyhall, there is about a hundred kids sitting there ... and there were
three teachers monitoring ... and in the study hall you had access to
buy milk .. and coke ... and snacks ... and what we did ... we broke these
big peices of 2 x 4s in the stair wails and we slit them into the door
handles of the cafeteria-studyhall, so you couldnt open the doors. And
when the bell rang for the next class, you had a hundred kids ... not
being able to get out of the cafeteria. We had jammed the 2 x 4s in the
doors handles in such a way that you really needed to ... hammer them
out for a while to set them loose ... and one teacher had a near heartattack.
And ... I got seriously reprimanded ...
All: Haha!
RF: You got caught ?
Kim: How about the one you doing the hunchbacksī son ... and getting arrested.
TM: I wonīt talk about the pigs ... Well. OK: Ask me any question, I will
answer it. I know now that itīs not an interview ... So letīs go.
RF: You just came back from a tour ... You have been away from your bedroom
for many weeks ... How does it feel to be home again ?! Are you home again.
Is this your home.
TM: Are you implying that my home is the womb of the Statue of Liberty
?!
RF: I was talking about your bedroom, actually ... TM: What makes you
think that I HAVE a bedroom ?
Lee: Doesnīt EVERYONE have a bedroom ?
TM: I have a bed ! RF: Is this your home ?
TM: My parka is my home ...
RF: Hmmm ... Could you expand on that, where did you get it.
TM: Do you think Europeans have much more like a profound interest in
the concept of home than americans do ..
RF: Oh yes, definitely. BEcause Europe is much smaller, there is less
space. You cannot choose your home ... Lee: What do you mean by that?!
Nobody chooses their home ! Until they move away from home ...
TM: See ... In Europe it is like "Home !", "Homeland!" ... the Motherland,
the Fatherland. In America it is like: "Honey, Iīm home!" ... This says
much about the vastness between the two cultures.
Lee: The white ones
Kim: They white ones, yes.
TM: I think it has much to do with us trying to reach the moon ... (...)
... Do you think the moon is twin ?
RF: A twin ?
TM: Do you think that the moon is earthīs twin ? How important is the
moon to the earth ? (...)
TM: What do you think that our songs are about ?
RF: For me they are definitely not from this earth ... Not one of these
sounds that you make does relate toany human sounds. Its not sounds of
trains, of Mad Max movies, underground transportation, factory-chains
... Itīs sounds from farther than the moon. Extraterrestral Sound ...
Not like Science Fiction Sounds ! Itīs sounds from another planet ...
TM: If it was fiction you wouldnīt hear it.
RF: You make them hearable !
TM: Yeah ... maybe itīs apprehension of what it could be.
RF: You give a form to this fiction ! I saw it like a huge ... living
planet .. that has the form of a ... dark flowerbud. When you play, this
bud is opening ... Itīs made out of metallic rubber ...
TM: You are talking about sex ... through concepts of photosynthesis.
Do you realize that you as the listener ... you are a bee ... buzzing
around our hive. Listen to that earliest of rock-songs "Iīm a King Bee
baby ... buzzing around your hive. I can make honey. Let me come inside"
... That has a lot to do with ... with cosmology ... through photosynthesis.
Which is basically the most ... highly natural state of ... of sexuality.
Ha ! Why is Jerry Lewis so popular ! Well, the orgasm is just a frogleg
twitching ... Ha !
Lee: Did you just made that UP ?
TM: I just read that in a Lou Shiner (?) book. I mean, he was just talking
about jerking off without realizing that it is basically ...
(John throws his plastic frog on RFīs lap):
All: Haha !
RF: ... and slap it against the wall ... and it will fall down as a princess
...
TM: Do you think that humour is our downfall ?
RF: You call that humour ?
Lee: A good counter, there. We should keep a blackboard, keeping count.
Thatīs one for you Robert !
TM: Do you know the etymology of the word Robert ? Are you interested
...
RF: ... has to do something with īstrengthī or something ...
TM: Does it ?!
RF: ... Hmmm ... īroburī. Scandinavian.
TM: So you are aware of ..
RF: I was told ... I am not very aware. I am not very interested ...
TM: See. There is really no such thing as philosophy ... as far as we
are concerned. Because we are basically aware of the truth ... Philosophy
is just like ...
RF: It is a fiction too ...
TM: It is a fiction ... and we are trying to deconstruct the philosophy
so we can get back to ... get back to home.
RF: We have to deconstruct
the importance of philosophy ... or the status of philosophy. Not philosophy
itself ...
TM: So, how important is the philosopher ?
RF: Hmmm ... I like stories about Nietzschesī life ... or Witggenstein
... or Freud ...
TM: You are talking about a minority of people
Lee: You can wrap a philosophy around anyoneīs life !
RF: Rockandroll is the ultimate philosophy ... existential ...
TM: If Rockandroll is the ultimate Philosophy ... I tend to aggree with
that ... I think that Rockandroll and modern literature are the most important
philosophical movements of .. human history ...
RF: Philosophy has to do with ... people not being satisfied with their
home ...
TM: You think so ?!
RF: ... or with their appartment, or with their bedroom, or with their
bed. And ... being confronted with the unbknown ... and trying to find
... a new home ! And, as far as I see Rockandroll ... it is about the
same. Maybe you need more than a froglegsī twitching as a home. You need
to put your head somewhere ... and if itīs on the moon ... then the moon
is relevant to me. I was thinking about this story Burroughs was telling:
he basically says that everything that exists has a sense and that this
sense is evolution. Man has now come to end of his evolution in his present
state. He has been existing in this form for a few ten thousands of years
and now he is preparing to take his next step ... which will be space
!
TM: Well, we all agree with that !
RF: Andto go into space with this body is rather unpratica, but we have
another instrument ot go into space which is the astral body ...
TM: ... the amplifier !
RF: The amplifier, the astral body ... right.
TM: Weīve been hitting space for quite some time, pal !
RF: So ... how is sex in space ?
Lee: That is a great question ! How is sex in space ?! Do they know yet
? Has anybody ... has anyone ... has it been documented wether people
have had sex yet in space ? Cosī the russians did have some co-admissions
... It seems like a basic scientific bit of research ...
TM: I think sex IS space !
RF: Hmm.
TM: I think space is basically resultant of sex ... But letīs not get
heady about it ... Yeah. Why is the microphone in the shape that it is
?! (To camera-team:) Can we have a shot of this microphone !!!
RF: It is not running ...
Jean-Luc: It has been turned on and off.
RF: ... fragmented reality ...
TM: Jean-Luc, turn the camera on !
Jean-Luc: It runs now. You can see it by the little light ...
TM: (sings:) "I can see the light ... in your eyes.
RF: Jonathan Richman did a song about "Meeting on the astral plane" ...
TM: He got all his ideas from comic-books ... and he is quite removed
.. he refused to take it all the way .. and therefore he lost track ...
on what was going on.
RF: So that is the difference between fiction and fantasy ! And we were
talking about fiction and not fantasy ...
Kim: Thatīs reality ! RF: Reality is a fiction ...
TM: Fantasy is truer alternate reality than fiction would be ! Fiction
is just a tool. And that is why philosophy is just a fiction ... because
itīs just a tool. Something that is already inherently there ... But then
you are getting into realms of phenomenology which is like ... forget
it ! Itīs the birth of Rock ...
RF: Crawling from under a milk truck ..
TM: Crawling King Snake ! (...) Do you think that my heart is beating
faster than yours ... or what do you think that is going on ?! (...) ...
What do you feel like right now ? (...) ... Why are you basically generating
your questions toward me ? Why is that ? Why donīt we just throw them
up in the air and jump for them ... (...) ...
Kim: Are you talking with me ?!
Lee: Hey buddy, are you talking with me, Ha !
RF: ... Hmm, the point is that I donīt exactly see the situation: is this
an interview (pointing at Video-camera) ?
TM: Why do you have to know that ?
RF: Well, I want to know why I am in this picture ... because ... it winds
up to be an interview or a reportage about somebody who does a reportage
with an anti-interview concept.
TM: Well, you can actually convince yourself that we actually talk different
languages and ... in a matter of time it just will become ... like just
soliloquies running through your head ...
RF: Thatīs the point of my business, because I am a writer !
TM: Just think of it in .. just like ... totally sonorous levels.
RF: Hmm, yeah. Satisfying !
TM: Itīs just much more rewarding, I would think. It is actually much
more sort of ... like ... I think you can get more of an insight ... into
the Rock.
RF: The point is ... I like to think about things ...
Kim: And that is where we are opposite ... because we donīt really like
to think about things.
TN: Because we are of the realization that everything is thought out ...
Lee: We do think about things, but we donīt like to talk about thinking
about things. Because itīs like doubly abstracted from the word Go.
TM: And worst about it we have to think about talking about it.
Kim: We work more with our feelings ...
RF: I am in the unconfortable situation that I have to look ... now ...
for material to think about ... later. But I have at the same time to
think about what I will want to think about later.
Lee: Right ! But why do you wait until later to think about that ?!
Kim: I think it is a ... thing about going back and listen and reflecting
on it ... and approaching it again.
Lee: it is also .. in way ...
TM: ... think of a woman !
RF: Hmmm. Control and Psychic Coincidences
Kim: I think that you donīt know yet what you want to do, except the stories
... and right now, Thurston is on your face and itīs kind of hard to see
what there is to do.
RF: Thurston says that it is all thought ou ..
Kim: He doesnīt really believe that !
Lee: Also, you are putting yourself in the position of -- wether it is
called a conversation or an interview -- of asking questions. We are in
the position of being these people that other people come up to and say
like: Iīd like to talk to you, Iīd like to ask you a question. And then
sometimes, if they donīt get what they want, they get annoyed. And yet
it is not our responsability ... utlimately to spoon-feed the proper path
of conversation ... or whatever.
TM: Our only responsability is to be gosts ... Voice in the back: Goats
?
Kim: Thatīs the confusion ! Some of us think we should be gosts and other
people think we should be goats ... within the group.
TM: Well this is confusion ... thatīs sex also ! ... (...) ... I am thinking
of a girl!
Lee: Who is she Thurston ? Voice in the back: Tina Louise ! Lee. Wow !
Hey, how did you say that !
TM: I recently found some great photos of Tina Louise ...
Lee: ... in an old Modern Man Magazine ! ... there is pages of pictures
of Tina Louise ! We have been looking at them for the last week ... See,
that kind of coincidence is realm on which we operate. Now. We found these
pictures of this girl. And now, out of the blue, this guy (Byron) knew
it ! And he mentioned her name ... That happens quite often: that kind
of psychic coincidence.
Voice in the Back: You make it happen -- or does it just happen ?
Lee: I donīt know. Can we make this happen ?!
RF: Yeah. Thatīs the point can you make these things happen in interviews
??
Lee: Why should we ?! Voice in the back: Just to find out you can !
Kim: There is always a certain amount ... we donīt control EVERYTHING
! And thatīs oart of the balsie (?): we are supposed to control something
... There is always a certain amount you CAN control in your life. But
we are not sure we WANT to control it ...
RF: But this is the same with the ... interviewer ...
TM: ... the quiz-masterist !
RF: He also is expected to be in control ... and it is not obvious.
Kim: But this is your responsability. You are have to have a certain order,
you are making the book ... an order you feel conforable with ... in relationship
to how we are.
Voice in the back: It is like a set-list for a show. Somebody has to present
an order in which the chaos can happen ... So that it actually starts
and then it ends.
Lee: But the show is OUR responsabilty ! Not the talk.
Kim: We are responsable for the stage, for the music -- and we accept
interviews. But we donīt take them so seriously ... We mostly care about
the music.
RF: But if you set up an order ... or you put an aim and you steer towrds
that aim ... you are not open for anything else that can happen.
Lee: Thatīs not true !
Voice in the Back: Thatīs the Ego !
TM: You are the Ego ! You are creating the Ego ... that you think exists
... and therefore you are basically pointing at a portion of yourself.
(End Side A)
|