[floatingslowly]

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

If you love studious and strikingly beautiful Human Beings from a nation not your own, the library is for you. Trust me.*

(*edited for semantic paranoia)

Implying they'd "love" me back, and by "love", I mean, "try to look up my skirt with mirrored-shoes".

[!@#$%!]

ps (for glice) - upon further thought i get that rob's new title would seem to perpetuate the notion that attraction only happens between members of opposite genders, but does he really go around breaking other people's legs?

[floatingslowly]

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

tiny, inconsequential snatches

vs. giant "sloppy dongs"

I see what you did there.

[Rob Instigator]

You see all.

[Genteel Death]

Let's study each other. From the back our minds. HA!

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by Genteel Death

Suchfriends can fuck off though. Rasta is a shit state of mind to be in.

 

These gentlemen would like to have a few words with you about your recent comments regarding HIM Haile Selassie I

[foreverasskiss]

between the ages of 10-14 i was highly attractive to black women and gails. maybe it was because i live and come from a highly populated african american region of the US where black women tromp white women by margins, but also because i found thier thick legs and asses stimilating and exciting. used to have this black female 7th grade teacher who never shaved her legs and wore stockings. gross maybe to you, but it always turned me on and served for some great early sex fantisies. hardly had any white girls in my classes and black girls usually almost always flirted with this white boy(me).

from the ages of 15-21....totally obsessed with blondes and redheads. of course they had to be built like black women and of course by that time most white women were(95-2000). don't know if white women were trying to compete with black women but it totally won me over. and black guys too( no more flat white girl booty name calling).

then there were those couple of years of being infatuated with mexican women. now it's just white brunettes with tough slutty looks(2009-2013).

i am a sad sad man.

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

what is funny is I've been seeing you trolling trying to get knox to diss you for like three days now and she just won't take that twomp bait cappin yo

[foreverasskiss]

fuck the other threads. bump this mutha.

[foreverasskiss]

Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous

what is funny is I've been seeing you trolling trying to get knox to diss you for like three days now and she just won't take that twomp bait cappin yo

i wasn't trying to troll her. i was trying to get to know her then she got on my nerves. like every new woman in my life. ha. take some time, let it marinate, get rid of her....then i always regret it.

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

haha, I don't even know why, but I thought that Flotz posted those comments and he has most definitely been trolling her like crazy. I think she likes him, but does she know he is a robot and not a lesbian feminist?

 

[foreverasskiss]

well, he is a cat lover and that has to account for something. though funny, i can never sometimes understand his posts anyway. i giggle then

[Murmer99]

 

[foreverasskiss]

^^^ok, you finally made me laugh or lol>><<<gol?

meanwhile, someone needs to tell Genteel Asskiss that he needs some punk rock graffiti in the background of his avatar.

it'll be my pleasure.

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

 

[knox]

At least this is proof of how bothered you were by all the conversation.

I know I can't expect Suchfriends to be honest here, but I never said males aren't violent to other males.

Instead, I did imply that our patriarchal idea of manhood promotes violence.

For anyone who will insist on the biological determinism, I suggest... I don't know, reading?

[knox]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

ps (for glice) - upon further thought i get that rob's new title would seem to perpetuate the notion that attraction only happens between members of opposite genders, but does he really go around breaking other people's legs?

in a way it's kind of worse because if he would break people's legs he'd have to do one at a time and by maintaining this speech he's endorsing and maintaining thousands of years of stigmatization and heteronormativity.

[knox]

also, congratulations on the "lesbian feminist" - in what world is that an insult?
besides, i'm sure flo is a lesbian feminist. <3

[Nefeli]

i m going to post this picture here; i saw it posted somewhere else today.
i would post it in the irrelevant thread and only for not to be misunderstood that it has anything to do with the rape comments here or in the other thread, if there were any. but it is going to get lost in there.

so it has nothing to do with rape comments here
and i m bad for not taking the time to read both threads.

 

the point i want to make with this pic
is smth i wanted to say in the other thread as well, but now this pic helps me.

we dont exactly need feminism for that.
for me it is the way that people should normally think.
its because people are lazy or because it suits them better, not to try and think bit harder. you know, just do a couple of more turns in your thoughts. see more ankles of what you are thinking.
thats why i always welcomed extreme voices for example in politics, even if i might not agree with what their saying; even though it might come against my extremely anti-violent position in all matters.*
because it helps people to shake their minds a bit.


* and since i m honest, dont think for a minute that there arent times when i question this about myself.
i think harder when that happens. (totally irrelevant that now).

[knox]

Originally Posted by Nefeli

i m going to post this picture here; i saw it posted somewhere else today.
i would post it in the irrelevant thread and only for not to be misunderstood that it has anything to do with the rape comments here or in the other thread, if there were any. but it is going to get lost in there.

so it has nothing to do with rape comments here
and i m bad for not taking the time to read both threads.

 

the point i want to make with this pic
is smth i wanted to say in the other thread as well, but now this pic helps me.

we dont exactly need feminism for that.
for me it is the way that people should normally think.
its because people are lazy or because it suits them better, not to try and think bit harder. you know, just do a couple of more turns in your thoughts. see more ankles of what you are thinking.
thats why i always welcomed extreme voices for example in politics, even if i might not agree with what their saying; even though it might come against my extremely anti-violent position in all matters.*
because it helps people to shake their minds a bit.


* and since i m honest, dont think for a minute that there arent times when i question this about myself.
i think harder when that happens. (totally irrelevant that now).

the fact is, dear, we do need feminism for that.
if you think that's how people should normally think, then you already are a feminist.
and the sad truth is, they don't. not the majority of them.