[Kloriel]

very underrated. need more loot, clearly.

doubleUdoubleUdoubleUDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=WLCxffb8cCk

[Satan]

kloriel youre ridonkulous

[Kloriel]

i would take you more seriously if you had a better avatar. your name is satan. but satan is so .. i mean we got the bible, we got dante, milton, c.s. lewis etc. I want to see YOUR satan. Make it happen. doubleUdoubleUdoubleUDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=givZsEAW80k

[Satan]

satan as defined by satan?

[Kloriel]

no...

[Satan]

is there some confusion between username vs avatar going on

i don't have an avatar
satan is my name

[Kloriel]

sorry i have a learning disability. it isn't your fault, it is my brain that expects to see a pictorial expression in conjunction with your potent nickname. But there are people that have expressed it more clearly than me. I mean I have flippers for hands and crap myself often. So let's just leave it to: doubleUdoubleUdoubleUDOTUtubeDOTcom/watch?v=yJQFf0qj9Nk

[Satan]

ahaa wtf

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by Kloriel

very underrated. need more loot, clearly.

doubleUdoubleUdoubleUDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=WLCxffb8cCk

have you seen Raphael Saadiq solo? That motherfucker is BAD! Single-handedly resurrected AUTHENTIC mo-town! He and his group got the moves, the sound, the band, the vibe, I FUCKING LOVED IT!

I wish I could go to one of his shows, I saw a live performance on the Artists Den..

more from Live at the Artists Den.....

I actually wanted to post about this dude awhile ago, I just loved that performance, I haven't seen anything contemporary like it

[Kloriel]

SUCH

i'm very glad you're not in jail.

school going ok?

p.s. no i haven't seen that solo recs, but thanks for mentioning it

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by Kloriel

SUCH

i'm very glad you're not in jail.

school going ok?

me too

yeah school is cool, I work there now.

did you check out those links? whether you were serious or not, trust me that Raphael Saadiq show is some good, grown-folkz music. You will not be disappointed..

[Kloriel]

yeah I'll check it out soon. I'm more concerned with spin doctors at this moment. Do you think Satan needs a good graphic avatar too? I'm thinking like Dore or whatever the fuck his dead ass name was. Fuck dead geniuses.

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by Kloriel

yeah I'll check it out soon. I'm more concerned with spin doctors at this moment. Do you think Satan needs a good graphic avatar too? I'm thinking like Dore or whatever the fuck his dead ass name was. Fuck dead geniuses.

I think Satan needs a lot of things but I am not one to talk

[Satan]

Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous

I think Satan needs a lot of things but I am not one to talk

cmon tell me!

[Kloriel]

i mean it is going to go way back to gnostic thought, and pb's probably one of the only certified people around that can dole it out like it stands. Not that there aren't others that could swarm him with a pox of laxative driven rooks. Glice I think knows some shit, and there's probably a few smart lurkers around. But i'm assuming you're concerned with the epsitomolecularology of your name and the lack of pictoral reference. On a grunting primal level in a fictious world I'd fuck your tits and smear my scent all over your pores. But I'm just a goofer, I kid around; I'm really more interested in taoism.

[Glice]

Everyone's into tao, for the tao is in the one, and in the many.

I wrote an essay on Genesis (as in the Bible, not the band) being directly represented within the Tao te ching. It required that both 'God' and 'Tao' are taken to mean 'not directly representible to the human consciousness' (that is, destituting each language's syntax). I was quite pleased with myself.

I think the representation of Satan in popular culture is something that doesn't really come in until the dark ages; I'm not even sure the gnostics represented 'him' pictorially. I know that a lot of what we consider 'ancient' representations of Satan/ Satanic sorts are 18th- or 19th-century fabrications (most notably, Baphomet) thrown about by neo-Gnostic groups like the Rosacrucians.

But yeah, I do think that Satan needs a new avatar. Something very zingy. Very now. What does Satan represent, in 2009?

Kloriel, your posts are brilliant.

[wellcharge]

i need to bump them,and lucy pearl, raphael saadiq is an amazing talent

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by Kloriel

i mean it is going to go way back to gnostic thought, and pb's probably one of the only certified people around that can dole it out like it stands. Not that there aren't others that could swarm him with a pox of laxative driven rooks. Glice I think knows some shit, and there's probably a few smart lurkers around. But i'm assuming you're concerned with the epsitomolecularology of your name and the lack of pictoral reference. On a grunting primal level in a fictious world I'd fuck your tits and smear my scent all over your pores. But I'm just a goofer, I kid around; I'm really more interested in taoism.

be careful, isn't Satan underage?

'she was only 17, but she was sexy..'

 

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by wellcharge

i need to bump them,and lucy pearl, raphael saadiq is an amazing talent

isn't he?

[pbradley]

I think my avatar is more representative of "satan" than any depiction of a metaphysical being. I consider diabolism to be a humanism (or, rather, antihumanism) that was adopted into theology.

(My avatar is from the cover of the Penguin Classic publication of G.K. Chesterton called The Man Who Was Thursday)