[static-harmony]

http://www.dailytech.com/Apple+Gets+...ticle14950.htm


So much for Apple's being "immune" to viruses

A curious falsehood has surrounded Mac computers over the last decade, as they have resurged onto the market. People believe that Macs are immune to the malware, viruses, and worms that have wrought havoc on PCs.

In reality, OS X is not much more or less secure than Windows Vista -- rather it is Apple's small market share that has protected it. Since Mac attacks would have to be custom-made, there just hasn't been much interest among Black Hats to attack them. Kevin Haley, a director of security response at Symantec, states, "The bad guys generally go toward the biggest target, what will get them the biggest bang for their buck."

However, with surging market share and pop icon status, the Macs are suddenly finding themselves under attack. On the heels of Apple's announcement that customers should get an antivirus program, Apple has been attacked by what are some calling OS X's first official trojan virus. The trojan, dubbed "iBotnet", has wormed its way into several thousand Macs. The virus is written specifically for Mac computers and does not affect Windows machines.

The new virus infects users’ computers via pirated copies of Mac software iWork, which have been floating around P2P networks. It was first reported in January, and unlike other viruses, like the Conficker worm, is relatively harmless due to the small number of infected machines (precluding effective denial of service attacks) and user role in infection.

States Paul Henry, a forensics and security analyst at Lumension Security in Arizona, "We all knew it was going to happen. It was just a matter of time, and, personally, I think we're going to see a lot more of it."

While the new worm is the first to only target Macs, it’s not the first botnet to consist of some Mac machines. Jose Nazario, a senior security researcher with Arbor Networks, states, "This isn't the first botnet that's been built using Mac computers. This is an interesting one in that it's a little more flexible and includes some new features. ... It's getting a lot of press mostly because it's Mac and people are talking about how Macs are immune to malware -- and, sure enough, they're not."

In a statement, Apple responds, "Apple takes security very seriously and has a great track record of addressing potential vulnerabilities before they can affect users."

Macs today account for approximately 7.4 percent of consumer computers in the U.S., according to Gartner, a leading market research firm. While, according to Gartner, these users on average are more affluent than PC owners, the unproven nature of Mac virus software (owing to their low market share in the 90s) has made Mac viruses still unexplored territory. However, that looks to be changing, and given Apple's slow rate of patching, it could be in trouble in the near future, particularly with the prospect of Apple-specific worms hitting in the near future.

[floatingslowly]

The new virus infects users’ computers via pirated copies of Mac software iWork

if you installed pirated software, you have clicked "yes, I would indeed like to install this spyware on my computer".

nothing new.

PEBKAC

[pbradley]

Yeah, Macs were never immune to viruses. That's like saying Native Americans were immune to European diseases before Columbus and the rest trojan'd the shit out of them. But it's funny that this article cites "surging market share and pop icon status" as the reasons instead of the Mac user's self-superiority directed as Windows users. At least that's the reason most people will be celebrating the news this article bares. Really, though, this isn't going to level any kind of playing field. Mac will always have a smaller market share and even then there are more stable options like Ubuntu.

[terminal pharmacy]

i use clamxav but i dont download much so only check my downloads.