do you agree with animal testing?

jon boy · 09.15.2006, 07:34 PM

hhhmmmm

Glice · 09.15.2006, 07:35 PM

Yes. Does that make me a bad person?

Cantankerous · 09.15.2006, 07:35 PM

no. except for smoking monkeys. that's just funny.

jon boy · 09.15.2006, 07:42 PM

i dont. not for anything. i think its terrible.

GeneticKiss · 09.15.2006, 08:15 PM

I won't buy Gillette products becuz of their rep for exceptionally barbaric animal testing.

flophousefloozie · 09.15.2006, 08:37 PM

Why should we subject the innocent to such selfish acts, simply for the betterment of our demanding, greedy civilization?

finding nobody · 09.15.2006, 11:58 PM

I've seen some horrible videos that made me want to cry. So, no I don't agree

HaydenAsche · 09.16.2006, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flophousefloozie

Why should we subject the innocent to such selfish acts, simply for the betterment of our demanding, greedy civilization?

So our make-up doesn't give us a rash.

umjammer atomsk · 09.16.2006, 12:06 AM

sonicl · 09.16.2006, 12:55 AM

I disagree with animal testing, but not as much as I disagree with animal rights terrorism.

Norma J · 09.16.2006, 02:26 AM

No. Most definitely not. It is totally unnecessary.

fishmonkey · 09.16.2006, 04:01 AM

i agree with Animal Testing, they need to be able to pass some level of crtieria before any sort of third level education.

Tokolosh · 09.16.2006, 04:16 AM

No, but it looks like we have no other choice, unless we test everything on humans only.
That is considered unethical, when it comes to certain drugs or products.

wax · 09.16.2006, 04:44 AM

not all the way, i dont think it is a simple yes or no question.
it seems alot of the experiments are done by idiots and are unnecessary and are just wild stabs in the dark.
but when it comes to a member of my family having a disease that there is no cure for, i dont care too much if some lab rats die in an attempt to cure it.
putting make up on animals is disgusting.
testing perfumes also.
but as a cure for diseases.......i am for it.

khchris(original) · 09.16.2006, 02:55 PM

i think there should be another option of "To a certain extent" because I think all of us can agree that there have been some forms of animal testing that have been beneficial to our society. there's nobody here that is 100% absolute on either yes or no.

PAULYBEE2656 · 09.16.2006, 03:04 PM

i totally agree. its the only way to sort out the intellectuals from the dunces

Sheriff Rhys Chatham · 09.16.2006, 03:08 PM

Well, what does animal testing say?
Don't know if I agree with it if I don't know what it says.

Hip Priest · 09.16.2006, 05:39 PM

I don't agree with it.

flophousefloozie · 09.16.2006, 05:59 PM

I do agree with wax and khcris, though.

I guess the least we can do is thank our fury friends for allowing mankind to progress.

TO THE RATS!

Norma J · 09.16.2006, 06:17 PM

I don't agree with animal testing at all under any circumstances.

Testing on humans is fine by me. Atleast if the human were being tested on, it'd be consented. Humans are far more ghastly creatures than any animal.

View Poll Results: do you agree with animal testing?
yes	18	37.50%
no	30	62.50%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

09.15.2006, 07:34 PM	#1
jon boy invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: psycho battery Posts: 12,161	hhhmmmm __________________ Sarcasm[A] is stating the opposite of an intended meaning especially in order to sneeringly, slyly, jest or mock a person, situation or thing \|@ <------- Euphoric brain cell just moments before expiration V _ \ / _ PING <-------- moments later / \ http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljhxq...isruo1_500.gif
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.15.2006, 07:35 PM	#3
Cantankerous invito al cielo Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: A RETIREMENT HOME Posts: 18,499	no. except for smoking monkeys. that's just funny. __________________ RETIRED
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.15.2006, 07:42 PM	#4
jon boy invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: psycho battery Posts: 12,161	i dont. not for anything. i think its terrible. __________________ Sarcasm[A] is stating the opposite of an intended meaning especially in order to sneeringly, slyly, jest or mock a person, situation or thing \|@ <------- Euphoric brain cell just moments before expiration V _ \ / _ PING <-------- moments later / \ http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljhxq...isruo1_500.gif
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.15.2006, 08:15 PM	#5
GeneticKiss expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 1,666	I won't buy Gillette products becuz of their rep for exceptionally barbaric animal testing.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.15.2006, 08:37 PM	#6
flophousefloozie expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Cowtown, Canada Posts: 1,694	Why should we subject the innocent to such selfish acts, simply for the betterment of our demanding, greedy civilization?
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.15.2006, 11:58 PM	#7
finding nobody invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Florida Posts: 7,275	I've seen some horrible videos that made me want to cry. So, no I don't agree
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 12:06 AM	#9
umjammer atomsk the end of the ugly Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 889	No. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 12:55 AM	#10
sonicl invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,527	I disagree with animal testing, but not as much as I disagree with animal rights terrorism.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 02:26 AM	#11
Norma J invito al cielo Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Orstralia Posts: 4,917	No. Most definitely not. It is totally unnecessary. __________________ I want girls with new-wave hair-doos
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 04:01 AM	#12
fishmonkey invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ireland Posts: 2,670	i agree with Animal Testing, they need to be able to pass some level of crtieria before any sort of third level education. __________________ "Pescescimmia ha grandi bulbi oculari blu, ognuno attaccato su un lato della sua testa, in modo tale da risucire a guardare indietro senza girare la sua testa pesciosa"
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 04:16 AM	#13
Tokolosh invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Plaza de Toros Posts: 6,731	No, but it looks like we have no other choice, unless we test everything on humans only. That is considered unethical, when it comes to certain drugs or products. __________________ Anything you can /imagine is real
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 04:44 AM	#14
wax the destroyed room Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: brum - england Posts: 554	not all the way, i dont think it is a simple yes or no question. it seems alot of the experiments are done by idiots and are unnecessary and are just wild stabs in the dark. but when it comes to a member of my family having a disease that there is no cure for, i dont care too much if some lab rats die in an attempt to cure it. putting make up on animals is disgusting. testing perfumes also. but as a cure for diseases.......i am for it.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 02:55 PM	#15
khchris(original) 100% Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: LA Posts: 708	i think there should be another option of "To a certain extent" because I think all of us can agree that there have been some forms of animal testing that have been beneficial to our society. there's nobody here that is 100% absolute on either yes or no.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 03:04 PM	#16
PAULYBEE2656 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: wexford, rep of ireland Posts: 6,930	i totally agree. its the only way to sort out the intellectuals from the dunces __________________ myspace facebook *twitter*
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 03:08 PM	#17
Sheriff Rhys Chatham invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New England. Posts: 4,027	Well, what does animal testing say? Don't know if I agree with it if I don't know what it says. __________________ My Music(grunge rock) A part of this blue shit since June 24th, 2004
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 05:39 PM	#18
Hip Priest invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Birkenhead Posts: 9,397	I don't agree with it. __________________ Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good. http://www.flickr.com/photos/outsidethecamp/
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 05:59 PM	#19
flophousefloozie expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Cowtown, Canada Posts: 1,694	I do agree with wax and khcris, though. I guess the least we can do is thank our fury friends for allowing mankind to progress. TO THE RATS!
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

09.16.2006, 06:17 PM	#20
Norma J invito al cielo Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Orstralia Posts: 4,917	I don't agree with animal testing at all under any circumstances. Testing on humans is fine by me. Atleast if the human were being tested on, it'd be consented. Humans are far more ghastly creatures than any animal. __________________ I want girls with new-wave hair-doos
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|