![]() |
#41 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,934
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
while it would be ideal to live in a society that teaches people not to rape, the sad fact is that sociopaths will do whatever they feel like doing because they just don't care, no matter what you teach them.
It is analogous to police. they cannot stop people from breaking into your home. the only thing they can do is try and teach ways to keep yourself from being broken into, and then after it happens, to try and catch (ha!) the person that broke in. If it was simply a matter of education it could be fixed for good. "A sociopath is simply a human who combines a total absence of empathy with a profound sense of entitlement. They feel no pain but their own." - Andrew Vachss Those people cannot be taught. They learn how to respond in the manner that will gain them approval, regardless of how far that response is from what they truly feel. Our current society seems to create more sociopaths than ever. Many people argue that the pop culture breeds and ingrains these thoughts into people who are susceptible to becoming sociopaths.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#42 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,255
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
the thing is, when you don't say "i'm a feminist", it makes us weaker. it makes it sound like it's a bad word or something that you wouldn't want to identify yourself as one. men/people will tell you that like it's some sort of insult when they are annoyed you're not being as submissive as they would like you to. but there's nothing wrong with being a feminist or a LGBTT supporter, I'm very proud of those things myself. I hope you understand what I mean.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#43 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,255
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Are you seriously trying to argue that every rapist is a sociopath? Doesn't even make sense IN NUMBERS. But if you most know, all rapists think all men do the same thing as they do. http://dbzer0.com/blog/feminists-don...sts-rapists-do It's like I accidentaly got myself in a time machine and went back in the 1950s or something.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#44 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,934
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
you really read a lot into things knox.
I was just making a comment about the inability to teach people NOT to do evil things.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#45 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,255
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
And their ability to teach them to go ahead and do evil things and still exempt themselves of any responsability over the message they convey or what it represents. Oh, and by the way, people don't become sociopaths, they just are, and they are a minority. And we don't have any more sociopaths than ever, we have more powerful weapons that enable them to do more crazy shit. Now, can we teach people to operate in a sociopath-like logic when we tell them it's acceptable to forget empathy, self-assessment and responsibility over certain things? Of course. We can even teach them that there's nothing wrong with it or that it's only natural and that they're still "good people". That's how sexism, racism and discrimination operate.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#46 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,934
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
you are wrong knox. people can and do become sociopaths.
read up on it. Most serial rapists, killers, abusers who can be classified as sociopaths come themselves from backgrounds of terrible abuse, terrible trauma. Not every abuse victim becomes sociopathic, but many do as a response to the world which they have experienced, full of fear and endless terror. It creates a disconnect in the brain, a willful detachment from shared "reality."
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#47 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,255
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No. People do not become sociopaths.
Sociopaths that have been exposed to violent environments can become VIOLENT sociopaths. Most sociopaths aren't violent. No one knows the cause of the neurological abnormalities that have been recently observed that can cause someone to be unable to feel empathy, but people are born that way. Society can shape HOW violent/dangerous someone with antissocial disorder can become. And it's in that sense that a violent environment enhances violent leanings. Most people who have been abused or witnessed violence as children do not grow up to be violent and cannot "become" sociopaths. The great majority of "sociopaths" never kill or rape anyone. The vast majority of rapists are not sociopaths. It's kind of funny that you tell me to read up on it when I've been reading about it for 5 years now. So, no, YOU read up on it. Start with Dr. Hare. And stop talking about things you don't know, please.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#48 | |
stalker
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 419
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#49 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,934
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
your absolutism is pathetic knox
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#50 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,165
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
"read up on it" & "study up on it" are the hallmarks of a failed argument, typically reserved for creationists, pro-lifers, gun-nuts and flat-worlders. It brings nothing to the table except for a veiled jab that (often wrongly) suggests that the user of this phrase is more well-versed in whatever given subject is at hand, but is simply a lazy cop-out. You are better than this....don't do it! |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#51 | ||
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fucking Los Angeles
Posts: 14,801
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Feminism (from the Latin "Of women") + attacking women who disagree with you = DOES NOT COMPUTE ![]()
__________________
Today Rap music is the Lakers ![]() |
||
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#52 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fucking Los Angeles
Posts: 14,801
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
You must spread some reputation around before giving it to Nefeli again.
__________________
Today Rap music is the Lakers ![]() |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#53 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,495
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
nefeliiiiiiii! clear yr pms for a subject totally unrelated to this ( i thought you'd read this thread, see) |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#54 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,495
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
thanks! back later...
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#55 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,255
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
are you people seriously trying to imply that feminism is not humanism and equality? because thats like the biggest joke among serious humanists that so many people are so blind with entlitlement (and possibly mysoginy, in this case) that they cant stand proper terminology for certain aspects and groups. its a well accepted fact that one cannot be a humanist without being a feminist.
and rob theres no need to act like a baby because you said something innacurate and i reccommended you to read the biggest expert on the subject, dr. robert hare. now you can practice what you preach and read up on it.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#56 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: www.masonhq.com
Posts: 1,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Maryland Man Sues Firing Range for 'Reverse Sexism'
By ABBY ELLIN Aug. 24, 2012 One Monday last October, Derrick Hunter decided to go shooting at the Maryland Small Arms Range in Upper Marlboro, his local firing range. He paid the $15 entry fee, and went inside. And that's when the metaphorical bullets started to fly. According to Hunter, 34, a special police officer, two women walked in behind him. Since it was "Ladies' Day," a longtime staple at the club, a manager told them they didn't have to pay. Hunter heard the exchange, and asked if he could use the range for free too. "He said, 'It's Ladies' Day and you don't meet that criteria,'" he told ABC News. He accuses the firing range of "reverse sexism." "Any time you get any kind of discrimination it does hit home to a certain extent," he said. "I have children. If don't stand for something you'll fall for anything. Sooner or later you have to stand up for your rights." Hunter complained to the Human Relations Commission of Prince George's County, which reviews cases of discrimination. In August, it concluded that the case had merit. Last week, Hunter filed a $200,000 lawsuit against the firing range. Carl Roy, president of the gun range, said he doesn't think he is doing anything illegal by letting in women for free. "It's a governmental micro-managing society," he said. "If you read the county ordinance, they are narrowly construing discrimination to mean if you give a discount to somebody, then you got to give it to everyone. But no one is saying anything about age discrimination. They're not saying anything about occupational discrimination, or JC Penney giving free haircuts to children for the month of August." Hunter's lawyer, Jimmy A. Bell, sees it differently. "If someone said because you were Jewish you'd have to pay more money, what would you think about that?" he said. "People don't look at it like that. People think a man should have to take it. And that's now how the law works." As it happens, attorney Bell is no stranger to discrimination suits. In 2010 he sued a nail salon after he shelled out $4 more for a manicure/pedicure than women were charged. He eventually settled with the salon for an undisclosed amount. But last year, he sued another nail salon, Nail First, on Hunter's behalf. Hunter didn't win any money, but the court issued a permanent injunction against the salon. This time that would not be enough, said Bell. "It's obvious that an injunction doesn't work," he said. "You've got to look at a person's dignity. When someone tells you that based on who you are, your physical characteristics, that you have less value to them than someone else, that stings a lot of people. It's illegal in our state. And it's been illegal since 1986." "The special court of appeals outlawed gender discrimination and ladies' night activities in 1986," he said. "You can't offer one benefit to one group and not to the other group based on sex." Brian Heller, a partner at Schwartz and Perry, an employment discrimination law firm in New York City, said the case is an interesting one. "On the one hand, the question is, are they treating men worse? Or are they treating women preferably?" said Heller. "And if they are treating women preferably, is there a legitimate business reason to do so? "It's ultimately going to have to come down to a jury looking at the facts and making a decision as to what the intent was," he said. "The range could argue that there's a good reason to attract women members, and that they're not treating men badly but that they're encouraging women to sign up." |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#57 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fucking Los Angeles
Posts: 14,801
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Not at all, its just that your interpretation of feminism lacks humanism.
__________________
Today Rap music is the Lakers ![]() |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#58 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,744
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I got all your posts completely and agree 100%. The fact that there is an issue with how genders relate to each other is no excuse to be a boring activist in areas of life that should exalt the human, rather than the gender. There are plenty of other venues where to fight for gender equality in a more effective way. Hence, for me, more Cosey Fanni Tutti and less Kathleen Hanna. |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#59 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,255
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think it's pretty sick when someone says something like "reverse sexism" or "reverse racism", It's like implying that one kind of sexism/racism is the 'right' one, the other is 'reverse'. They'll be digging for whatever kind of exception they can find to justify this sick point.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#60 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,255
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Oh yeah, my feminism is for non-humans. Since I'm part of the women rights board of a large human rights organization, I'm going to take your complaint up to the directors, thanks. We're going to store it in a big folder of emails we get from humanists that complain "there's too much being done about women and LGBTT, too much talk about racism" and not enough "about straight white men" who are terribly, terrible oppressed. It's such an offensive thing we can't talk about human rights in general terms and they are specific issues to tackle - it offends the sensibility of cis-men who think they're being excluded. boo hoo. Unless you're a pro-lifer. We don't take comments from pro-lifers. They're not real people.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |