Quote:
|
Originally Posted by !@#$%!
you realize, knox, that every time a woman starts flaunting her entities on this board, that's all that people are going to talk about her from that point onwards, right?
that's more or less what happened to poor notyourfiend and her famous northern mountains. she was very smart, a good debater, knowledgeable & all, plus she wasn't attracted to men, but it was difficult to peel one's eyes away after she brought them up, with pictures. a shame truly. same with girlgun's cleavage, which obscured any other virtues she may have had. we're hardwired boobhounds.
by comparison, look at all the fools talking about their cock and getting plenty ignored. it could be that women are more evolved beings, or it could be simply that a woman's body is a thing of beauty while the male turkey neck is a constitutionally ugly and malformed thing.
come to think of it, we don't just objectify women-- we objectify every fucking thing on this planet. so don't take that personally.
|
The thing is, if one the ladies decides to show her tits on here, chances are that she's specifically trying to attract that sort of attention, and that is fine if they're not going to turn around and complain that their body is being exploited and all that feminist rethoric. It's your decision, after all. It's another story when thread after thread gets bombarded by idiotic remarks and pictures of women in sexy poses. Women are sexy, tell me something new, a fact pretty much established over the centuries. Does this mean that almost every topic where a female partecipates has to eventually fall into chats that hint at sex-related things? Not that sometimes those chats can't turn out funny.
See thread where luxinterior rose above semi-ironic comments on female and made mincemeat of atsonic. By the way, the female body isn't better looking than the male, they are equally attractive, it's just that we often we make only one of them a fuck-temple.