View Single Post
Old 04.09.2006, 04:46 PM   #15
khchris(original)
100%
 
khchris(original)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 708
khchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asseskhchris(original) kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpectralJulianIsNotDead
So, its ok for the US to have nukes but not any developing nations?


I'm not sure "ok", but the US is looked at as the world leader by default.

It certainly isn't any better having more nations join in on the Nuclear Arms battle.

The Cold War is over...no need for Nukes. Unfortunately, some nations have them still just to make sure nobody gets out of line.


It's sad, but what other choice do we have?
khchris(original) is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|