Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AllHandsOnTheBigOne
Yeah, I don't see anything wrong with it. I was simply following the logic. It's like we're all arguing semantics. "Well, it's ok that some of their music is shared online, and that only a small amount of fans have access to some of their music, but there's other music that's sacred. No one can touch that."
|
Maybe this should go without explaining...and maybe you don't mean this but as far as Live Recordings vs. Studio Official Recordings... there is quite a difference eventhough the songs are played are generally the same. Simply put, Official Studio recordings are the closest to being "sacred" they are what they are, meant to be purchased by the public/fans for enjoyment and to profit the artists. Live shows really don't have the same intent, they are performances of a particular moment in time at a particular place. so the band taking that stance has an open policy about sharing/distribution (w/o profit, obviously) of such recordings.