Quote:
|
Originally Posted by !@#$%!
right, it's all or nothing-- but because you can't eliminate all guns in america, it's abusive to demand that only certain citizens relinquish their right to self-defense, giving the criminals free rein. so what happens is that states with castle doctrine and more prevailing conceal carry there is less crime.
now look what happened in DC "the murder capital" of the 90s
http://washingtonexaminer.com/d.c.-m...4#.UMoyQW881OL
lemme see hold on... |
That is ridiculous use of hyperbole, surely you know the situation better than that. Giving criminals a free-reign? Nonsense. No one is talking about relinquishing self defense, but what the fuck do assault style weapons designed by the military? How exactly is that
self-defense? I didn't mean to imply ALL GUNS banned or ALL guns allowed, we're talking about the entire nation ALL in on certain restrictions (like 100% background checks and bans on assault-style weapons and munitions). If a few states or cities enact stict legislation that other regions scoff, then the guns from the scoff-laws will trickle down into the communities who are trying to be safer. Interesting that trickle-down theory only seems to work in negative circumstances :/