Originally Posted by blunderbuss
does shit have to be obscure to be wierd and good?
no, but they did list non obscure shit like flipper,wesley willis,the residents etc.
but maybe it does, because if something weird wasn't obscure then wouldn't people get used to it and not think it's weird? there are cases of albums being widely known and definitely weird,like trout mask replica, but i don't think it's that common
just thinking out loud....