View Single Post
Old 02.29.2016, 10:32 AM   #58
dead_battery
expwy. to yr skull
 
dead_battery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,928
dead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's assesdead_battery kicks all y'all's asses
false allegations and the stupidity of AUTOMATICALLY BELIEVING THEM because rape culture does not do any service to actual victims.

this rape culture you guys are talking about no longer legally exists. im sure it exists among some men still. but the law does not function that way.

its a description of what things USED to be like in more conservative and patriarchal times. but it is no longer a description of how the law functions. it is overwhelming on the side of the victim unless you are super rich and not famous.

the laws have already been changed. things are different. women DO lie about rape for petty, vindictive and narcissistic reasons. it happens.

some of you cannot think about the actual complex and nuanced world where your preferred narrative is only one side of the story.

the point of the false accusation is to start a hate mob against the accused and gain sympathy and attention for the accuser. its jeremy kyle/jerry springer shit. its what fucked up/amoral individuals do sometimes.

but you guys just cant accept this possibility because you're too blinded by the righteous hatred.

in the uk 2 famous actors from the soap opera coronation street were separately falsely accused. the courts eventually threw out the cases after it was proved that the women had made it all up.

and rich lib fems wrote articles after this ruling that started off "i DONT KNOW if x is innocent or not..." and then went into the usual canards about rape culture etc. etc.

because they will never admit to anything that contradicts the narrative they are pushing which is on display by posters in this thread, which is the redefinition of consensuality as something the woman can choose to define as present or not at any moment after the fact, and the automatic disbelief of a mans claim to consensuality.

there are complex reasons i suspect some women are doing this, they aren't good.

humans are stupid. we think the solution to misogyny is misandry. we are not so smart.

it's NOT ABOUT STOPPING RAPE. rich white lib fems are the most protected women in society. it's about power and in group narratives.

rich white lib fems maintain their comfortable positions on the backs of the exploited poor and sex workers

they want to keep those positions and their activist moralism is a confused mixture of trying to maintain it, purge their guilt and keeping open illusions of progression for those below them.
dead_battery is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|