Quote:
Originally Posted by !@#$%!
more interested than that, there's an article in "the nation" about the forced psychiatric confinement of former sex offenders who have completed their sentences on the basis of "mental abnormality" defined very vague psychiatric "symptoms" such as "has no formal work history" or "is now married".
http://www.thenation.com/article/what-weve-become
|
There's nothing ambiguous about the issue: can future crimes be stemmed by the non-punitive confinement of pathological offenders? It's an ethical concern.