and it's not new, it has been done forever.
i don't know how anyone cannot read the first few lines of that article, the tone that is set, and think that you are witnessing the end of post modernism.
is this authenticism being advocated not just irony that doesn't get what it is?
it's a regression that can't even escape pomo when it tries to.
i like mark fishers characteristic of pomo as a disease for which there is no cure.
the only thing that can possibly come after pomo has the affix "neuro". and it's already happening.
|