View Single Post
Old 06.10.2013, 02:13 PM   #6420
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,451
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genteel Death
And also, just because some paeadophiles jerk off to pictures of naked babies it doesn't mean that the babies' nudity is pornography.


right, pedophiles ruined baby photography for all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Genteel Death
I think that if you're easily aroused by nudity in contexts that obviously serve an artistic purpose you ought to question your attitudes towards sex and your own sex life in general.
the thing is though, contexts that obviously serve an artistic purpose are hard to come by these days.

as for me, i'll say this: when i see the picture of a very beautiful woman (e.g., that one i posted above) what i often get is not a boner but a lump in the throat. what does that mean? i don't fucking know, but i hope it's not cancer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toilet & Bowels
I read an article once about a man who is sexually around by cars and he liked to have sex with the exhaust pipe, but that doesn't mean that autotrader is a porno mag just because somebody can manage to jerk off to it, regardless of their social background.

Anyway, it's one of those vague art questions about where you draw the line....I'll have to think about this later, or I'll be late for dinner with the mother of someone you think is awesome.


the thing with kern is that he walks right on that line and you could legitimately say he makes porn and he is an artist and be correct on both counts. kern himself has said repeatedly he makes porn for rich people and while he might mean it ironically one could also take his words at face value. besides, porn and art have been together for milennia. i think ultimately pornographers are just terrible artists, with rare exceptions like just jaecquin or kern himself.

im rambling on a bad internet connection in a non-air-conditioned room at midday. probably makes for bad reasoning.

anyway, have fun.
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|