Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dead_battery
lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies
lies that can be verified as lies by the simplest of googles
lies.
|
Hold up, you can diss theology but you sound ignorant dissing history. Do explain how the pyramids were built without science? What about that obelisk I mentioned? I didn't make this shit up, you find this shit in the ground, it speaks for itself.
We have theories about how these were built, but nothing verifiable through SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. However, we do know for a fact that somehow they were built, because DUH, they're standing right there just outside of downtown Cairo. By the way, did you realize that the pyramids were built on the ONE small patch ground that could have supported quite literally a man-made mountain of stone? Had they been built even a mile or two away from their current location, the bedrock would not have been strong enough to carry the weight. By the way, we didn't discover this until satellite imaging technology revealed this.. How exactly did the Egyptians know it without science, something so damned advanced that even WE didn't know it until the 1990s??
As to the obelisk in Ethiopia, well shit, science STILL doesn't even have a single theory to explain how it was carved, moved 5 miles, and erected. The "sand pit by gravity" method which is believed to be how the Egyptians raised their obelisks is not able to explain the fallen one in Aksum, its simply too big. If that method had been used, the obelisk would have snapped in half as it leaned against the barrier used to raise smaller obelisks by gravity.. So.....