Sonic Youth Gossip - View Single Post

!@#$%! · 03.18.2018, 07:27 PM

GANGS OF NEW YORK

for scorsese, it was a bit shit i thought.

the pros: the epic subject! the historical portrayal of the time. daniel day lewis. brendan gleeson. liam neesom’s quasi-cameo. jim broadbent. john c. reilly.

the cons: cameron diaz out of her depth. lionardo-as-thug. lionardo’s stupid voiceover. the final fight. the narrative as a whole which is what the fuck?

i get that scorsese wanted to make an opera. so maybe i’m not a real fan of the opera.

started great and promising, ended in a kind of squeaky fart.

i rate it about as high as a 70s or 80s movie he did with dinero and maryl streep where they meet on the train and start fucking around on their spouses and it’s a sorta romcom. yeah you don’t remember the name either i bet or what happened.

03.18.2018, 07:27 PM	#22310
!@#$%! invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: mars attacks Posts: 42,460	GANGS OF NEW YORK for scorsese, it was a bit shit i thought. the pros: the epic subject! the historical portrayal of the time. daniel day lewis. brendan gleeson. liam neesom’s quasi-cameo. jim broadbent. john c. reilly. the cons: cameron diaz out of her depth. lionardo-as-thug. lionardo’s stupid voiceover. the final fight. the narrative as a whole which is what the fuck? i get that scorsese wanted to make an opera. so maybe i’m not a real fan of the opera. started great and promising, ended in a kind of squeaky fart. i rate it about as high as a 70s or 80s movie he did with dinero and maryl streep where they meet on the train and start fucking around on their spouses and it’s a sorta romcom. yeah you don’t remember the name either i bet or what happened.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|