To elaborate a bit on what Rob's saying - there are definite criteria for a band being 'good' or not, in much the same way that a fan of sport claims their team is 'the best'. These criteria are always contingent and rarely have any bearing on reality - for instance, England are a large margin away from being the best cricket team, but I swear they've got more spirit than the rest of them.
Where people get confused is that criteria doesn't mean empirical, or scientific criteria - you can no more put a band on a bit of litmus paper than you could fit an American Football side in a test-tube.
__________________
Message boards are the last vestige of the spent masturbator, still intent on wasting time in some neg-heroic fashion. Be damned all who sail here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savage Clone
Last time I was in Chicago I spent an hour in a Nazi submarine with a banjo player.
|
|