View Single Post
Old 01.11.2011, 03:26 PM   #1
SuchFriendsAreDangerous
invito al cielo
 
SuchFriendsAreDangerous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fucking Los Angeles
Posts: 14,801
SuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's asses
This issue is getting a lot of slack, especially here in LA where out local Teacher's Union (which I am defacto a part of) is vociferously speaking out against efforts by the feds, by the White House, by the governor, but the CA legislature, by the bitch ass mayor of LA, to include aspects of standardized student test scores in teacher evaluations which determine ALL (even veteran) teacher's job placement and security, and are conducted yearly and bi-yearly across the county and state. The issue is getting blown way out of proportion. Firstly, there is a running presumption that teachers, specifically here in California and LA are not properly or even routinely evaluated, which is absolutely and blatantly false. Teachers face many many evaluations, from the principals and administrators of the school/district, from the state, from the feds, from the unions, evaluations are critical aspects of teachers' lives and careers. Our job security is always on the line based on the fickle observations of various people who can sometimes have unilateral authority in make-or-break decisions..

But these evals tend to work and do their job, it keeps teachers on our toes, it keeps the administrators heavily involved in the classroom on a day to day basis, it establishes and maintains a fluid relationship between the two, it lets teachers know administrators know and see the day to day realities of the classroom and also gives administrators this peak into the classrooms to be able to make better managerial and curriculum decisions.. in other words, evaluations already work just fine. Can they be tweaked and made better, more effective and efficient? Of course! as they should be, but does including often misinformative standardized student test scores from yearly tests?

no..

In fact, we probably should throw out these tests all together! They are hardly representative of over-all student progress, comprehension, or competency, in fact they can often be quite the opposite. We all know the experience of just sitting there, zoning out, and filling in bubbles at random, even drawing patterns and designs or spelling out words with the bubble answer sheets. Teachers know this, students know this, administrators know this, unions know this, practically everybody but Barack Obama and Mayor Villagaraigosa were aware of this, and big surprise, these guys have little to know knowledge or experience of the field of public education!

The LA Times doesn't help, they against respectful requests from both the District and the Teachers' Union published teacher/student test scores which led to a lot of misconceptions in the public, misinterpretations by the public, and even a suicide by an multiple aware winning teacher who was ostracized over a misinterpretation of the data from her classes last year. Her evals were shining, it was just a mix up but there are a lot of unnecessary community backlash at her district and she folded under the pressure.. (rip)

Again, these tests are not very representative of anything other than the classroom management ability of adults to get kids to take these tests, and yet paradoxically we reiterate often to them that these tests do not affect their grades or their school records or their college potential, only can harm us. The kids that want to stick it to the teacher often purposefully do bad on these tests as a protest (which they have the right to do by the way).. Kids should be able to express themselves with out it necessarily harming their teachers and schools. Even the kids who take the tests seriously, are not necessarily going to do their best for several reasons, and this further exasperates the problem with these standardized tests.. The numbers from these tests are to be interpreted ONLY by expert, experienced educators who know all the parameters, all the variables, all the errors, and can better assess what they actually tell about our public education. Maybe these numbers should play some roll in evals, but not the 30 to even 50% (!!) that is being suggested! That gives to much power arbitrarily to administrators and deviant/protesting kids and puts to much pressure on teachers to get kids to pass a single test a year, rather then learn and grow on their own terms..

what do y'all think about this issue of standardized student tests and teacher evaluations?
__________________
Today Rap music is the Lakers
 
SuchFriendsAreDangerous is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|