Just kidding. I actually am really into a lot of his ideas, and definitely respect his brilliance and fortitude. I think the older I get the more I understand his work, it's deep and complex, just like individuals are, and I may not get everything he's trying to say but we as humans aren't meant to understand everything, either. Anyway, he's written things with a lot of meaning to me but discussions on him tend to get deep and insane, hence why no one else has replied.
...
Okay here's my philosopher impression...
"why?"
__________________
|