[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by demonrail666

I've heard that Hitchcock wasn't keen on the psychiatrist scene but felt it necessary for audience comprehension. It was self financed so he didn't have any studio pressure, and the whole film plays havoc with the Hays code. It was just a rare case of poor judgement by Hitchcock which he thankfully learned from in time for The Birds, which benefits from explaining nothing.

the code was still in effect in 1960? oh hell. ha ha ha ha. not so much the great tits, but that talk of alimony... shocking. well there's all kinds of stuff censors would frown upon in it.

thanks for all that info, i had no idea this was self-financed

looking up spielberg + hitchcock this stuff came up-- sad or funny? ha ha i vote funny

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-en...g-1796069.html