Quote:
Originally Posted by Pookie
Absolutely wrong. Lack of faith.
Yes because atheism is a lack of belief based on lack of evidence. If the evidence were there then belief (faith) wouldn't be necessary because you would KNOW.
|
If that is what atheism is, then I would have to be an atheist. But I don't think I am. What really is being argued is a certain philosophical wankery involving our different perceptions of the concepts of faith and belief.
Like I said, I think lack of faith is faith, and disbelief is belief, a lack of statement is a statement in itself and all that crap.
but doesn't atheism involve being
certain of the fact that there is no God?
I'm really just asking questions, i don't see the need to get so heated.
just relax a bit.