View Single Post
Old 12.23.2009, 09:37 PM   #201
knox
invito al cielo
 
knox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,255
knox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pookie
Absolutely wrong. Lack of faith.
Yes because atheism is a lack of belief based on lack of evidence. If the evidence were there then belief (faith) wouldn't be necessary because you would KNOW.

If that is what atheism is, then I would have to be an atheist. But I don't think I am. What really is being argued is a certain philosophical wankery involving our different perceptions of the concepts of faith and belief.

Like I said, I think lack of faith is faith, and disbelief is belief, a lack of statement is a statement in itself and all that crap.

but doesn't atheism involve being certain of the fact that there is no God?
I'm really just asking questions, i don't see the need to get so heated.

just relax a bit.
__________________
 
knox is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|