Don't get me wrong, I'm not criticising Hitchcock but I do think his style of making films isn't necessarily for everyone. Although I prefer him to Kubrick I put them in a similar category. They're both very 'technical' directors.
Anyway, from the sublime to the ridiculous ...
Sex and the City
I'm not gonna criticise this movie, it is what it is, but did it
really need to be roughly the same length as Stalker?!?