i find it acceptable that an animal wants to be wishfull thinking when it is in deep need to stay alive, under extreem situations
wishfull thinking from out an animal brain doesn't mean that there is a god
think about it like this
my design of evolution, from cellife in water to the walking ape now, has a basic of survival
and that is food
my stomic needs food and water or i simply don't survive, this is realistic
if i imagine something from my brain
in my brain i imagine, food and water
fantasy don't help my survival
i still loose
this is nature vs imagination of walking ape sapian
who is going to win?
you will know that an empty stomic will lead to death
no matter what you imaginate, a conversation with god , food or other imaginations
if you take this to real wild nature
you will see how real this is
you have 2 walking apes (a) and (b)
(a) is a naturally orientated
(b) is religious
there are 2 jungles where (a) and (b) are released without food
after 1 day (a) and (b) have found no food
(a) sets it's mind on sharp, is NOT counting on help, and knows death is getting closer, the situation is evaluated and the animal knows what emergency situation it is living, alert and ready to keep and keep searching for food and water
(b) as a religious person will be keeping conversations with it's own imagination, asking god for help, asking god for food and water, and wishfully thinking that it will found food because he/she had a conversation with god
(a)[nature] has more survival chances than (b)[religious]
and to come back to agression
why walking apes kill other walking apes
it is nature
in animal groups there is massive agression on animals from the same animal group when there is stress or a need of food
the animals fight for food
you have seen it on the animal tv channels, nature documentaries
animals fight so the strongest dna is created for the next generation
to survive on planet nature
|