Thread: Shooting at Virginia Tech campus
View Single Post
Old 04.20.2007, 03:26 PM   #445
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,468
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by k-krack
Fuck Rob, this is such a stupid thing to (agree with) say. Seriously, I'm not American, but the second ammendment is fucking bullshit, so primal in its nature that it's scary. Ted Nugent is a fucking trigger-happy wacko, and he is so obviously using this atrocity as a ploy to talk about how people that don't love their guns are pussies. Access to guns does not necessarily mean someone's goign to shoot it, BUT IT MAKES IT A HELL OF A LOT MORE LIKELY, especially with people like this Cho fella holding them. Which is not to say that there is no other way of getting a gun, BUT ANYBODY CAN GET A GUN AT THE DROP OF A HAT. THAT IS SERIOUSLY FUCKING ABSURD.

no no no no no no no and no!!!

the second amendment is not about what "the nuge" sez. it's NOT!!!!

K-KRACK: ted nugent will have you believe the u.s. constitution says that, but it doesn't. IT DOESN'T! he's confusing it with the individual right to self defense.

----

i hate it when people ignore the obvious. for fuck's sakes.

this is the second amendment. it was originally not even fucking punctuated:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

the right to individual self-protection precedes the constitution and it didn't require a constitutional amendment, it is part of english common law & so it has always been followed in the united states.

the second amendment refers to the right of the states to keep militias in order to balance a central power. the u.s. constitution gives the federal government the power to raise a standing army & the states feared that. this amendment was a concession to those states.
i've said this 3-4 times & people voluntarily choose to ignore it.

conflating the right to individual self-protection with the 2nd amendment is wrong, misguided, and (eventually) wilfully ignorant.

ted nugent is good for singing wango tango & poontang sweet poontang but he's no intellectual & HIS INTERPRETATION OF THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS ON CRACK.

--
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|