Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Severian
I have nothing against the stones.
....
They've been shit for 40 years longer than the Beatles even existed.
|
Make up your mind. But it's tough, isn't it? A productive decade followed by completely not giving a fuck about anything other than a paycheck. I so despise 70s-and-beyond Stones that it almost takes the shine off the good stuff.
But the good news is when Mick and Keith die, no one will ever say, "What a tragedy. They had so much more to offer."
I've probably derived more pleasure from the Byrds, so they'd go in my #5 slot. I don't expect anyone to agree.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mortte Jousimo
They havenīt made a bad album (wild Mood Swings is the weakest)
|
I agree. But I was listening to that a few weeks ago and realized it only half sucks. What an impressive catalog.
Cure>Stones
Silly comparison, I know. But I'm right.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
can we all agree that the Jefferson Airplane sucked? ha!
|
Jefferson Airplane>Herman's Hermits