Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Murmer99
Not sure what a Zinger Tower Burger is, but my only point was that DKR wasn't attempting to be the film Cronenberg is explaining. While I realize his comments are directed towards people who have viewed the film (not the film itself), he does go on to say a few other things that I felt could've been worded better.
I believe it is possible to elevate a certain style of film without having to be the most intellectually interesting piece of work. Sure it's Batman, but I'd still say that for a superhero movie it was quite intelligent (and as you somewhat pointed out) compared to its "competition". Why can't the film be seen for what it is then? does a film have to be one certain way? is there even a "right way" to make a film? if so, how? That was my point about what I thought sounded a little narrow-minded. I don't know, I don't mind if I'm alone on this.
I'm also excited to see the newest film Cronenberg directed by the way, Cosmopolis. I have a good feeling about it.
|
Not alone at all. I entirely agree. There isn't really a problem with the film so much as with its biggest fans and its staunchest critics equally trying to turn it into something it isn't.
Oh, a Zinger Tower Burger:
Think of it as the Iron Man of fast food burgers (in a good way)