View Single Post
Old 05.03.2010, 12:08 PM   #77
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,460
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glice
There's really not much to get.

well... i'd have thought that there would be more since he's so important.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glice
Fissure with reality.

no shit-- i thought parmenides had started all that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glice
It's a return to the Cartesian cogito with a destabilised (but by no means absent or irrelevant) empirical truth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glice
It's a logocentric theory that's oriented around contingency.


this reminds me of a brazilian song i can't recall the title right now. will post lyrics when i do.

anyway-- in english?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glice
I can't think of anyone who's produced a more workable, or plain metaphysics

yes but why? your shorthand doesn't really make an argument. i'm asking (in earnest here, though i might not have been above) that you attempt an explanation. pretend we're your students who know nothing here.

also, correct me if i'm wrong, but lacan dealt in psychoanalysis, not metaphysics. can you explain a) what you mean by metaphysics, and b) how psychoanalysis connects to metaphysics, in his case?

also, have you read freud?
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|