View Single Post
Old 01.05.2019, 06:12 AM   #4
dirty bunny
expwy. to yr skull
 
dirty bunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: oh, why Texas actually
Posts: 1,679
dirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's assesdirty bunny kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by !@#$%!
now if someone could write about popular photo sites like “the people of walmart” (which i hate...). those inflict a greater damage than any art gallery. they don’t even try to make an aesthetic appeal—they’re all just about derision, condescension, cruel laughter, feeling better by looking at someone "inferior." fuckem.




People of Walmart was the first thing that sprung to mind when I began reading the essay, and you summed up my thoughts on that website as well or better than I could!


As for the essay, I don't necessarily agree with the general thrust of his argument (which is the poor are exploited photographically).


The other thing is the general assumption that people don't view these kinds of photographs critically. Which may be correct. Maybe most people don't. But it's a good idea, and there are other good thoughts in the essay.
__________________
kiss me
kiss me in the shadow of a doubt
dirty bunny is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|