View Single Post
Old 06.03.2010, 12:56 AM   #270
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,500
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genteel Death
?'@:c2, you make an interesting point about the posting of certain pictures, and one I partly agree with. What if someone would start posting pictures of kids in sexual situations on a regular basis though? Would that make them less attached to the nudity they are posting?

it's clearly not the same, because while a grownup can decide to sell pictures of their funbags (this term, i learned, covers both nuts and boobage) for other people to get aroused, a child is not equipped to make such decisions, so in this case the picture would not be a sexy object but evidence in a criminal investigation. wouldn't you agree?
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|