Quote:
Originally Posted by dirty bunny
I thought II was great because you could build military dictatorships to crush your enemies. In III I didn't find it was as easy to build a military and conquer. And that sucked a lot of the fun out of it for me.
|
that's cause you're a warmonger

. the thing I love about IV is that there's such a big variety of ways how you can drive your fate, where military power supremacy is only one of the lot. unlike the previous Civ's, here it doesn't even matter how many cities your civilization has. which is cool.