|
bottom line ... let's say decartes. he seemed to have explored as much as he could, through logic, and his conclusion was wrong in a logical sense. trace elements of subjectivity in his conclusion. but that conclusion is i think unavoidable at a universal level. one can exhaust a sound, logical path, until the last second. the throw on of "therefore I am" inherent subjectivity. it isn't just in thought either. and at the risk of jaunting way out of my league... fuckin' physics. is existence of the universe not dualistic? I thought all things were headed towards a black hole.
|