One crime definitely has nothing to do with the other, however it implies that he's a habitual thug.
It's pretty brazen that he was going to publish a book called "If I Did It".
Do I think he murdered them, yup. Does my opinion mean anything. Nope. He was found "not guilty".
I still don't understand the California legal system that finds him not guilty in a criminal trial but guilty in a civil trial - it's either one or the other. The second trial shouldn't have happened if he was found not guilty in the first.
__________________
-Franky

Don't let yer meat loaf.
|