|
I think that sounds like a good idea. It would also be a way to get much more coherent and established thoughts, seeing as there is no rush in saying them and plenty of room to go back and edit. To still have the chat, but also a fully active thread discussion.
I also noticed a lot of emphasis on "nothing". He takes a lot of effort to describe things as unremarkable, boring, gray, and completely average (Manilov, especially). It will go nearly a page or more without really saying anything especially noteworthy, but saying a lot at the same time.
Who's criticism did you read?
|