View Single Post
Old 06.26.2008, 01:48 PM   #29
gmku
invito al cielo
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
gmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic Youth 37
Oh, I've seen quite a few of them. The only ones that I think are really all that great are Goldeneye and Casino Royale. Not a Moore or Dalton fan and the jury's still out on Connery.

Don't think I've seen Goldeneye.

I've probably seen quite a few Bond movies. I hate the Connery ones. Too gimmicky, too Hefner-Playboy-ish.

Over the past ten years, as Pierce took over, I kept going, thinking, This time they'll do it right. This time it won't be full of gadgets and unreal plot-lines. This time it will be gritty and real and well-written. A couple of them made it about 1/3 through like that and then everything went to hell. The elaborate sci-fi gadgets came out, the villian became all Super-Villainy.

Casino Royale is the only Bond movie I've ever seen that holds up from start to finish as a gritty, real, spy thriller. Its test is that you could take out all the Bond references and make it another spy thriller and it would still be great. It's a great story first, and a Bond movie second. That's what makes it so good.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks.
gmku is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|