[khchris(original)]

Originally Posted by atari 2600

First off, I want to thank everyone for their posts in this topic.

"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
-Abraham Lincoln

This is a rundown of what happened.

In amh's Kevchino.com reviews Rather Ripped! thread
http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=2025
about the review
http://www.kevchino.com/index.aspx?review=939)
they wrote for a website for the new album, khchris(original) characterizes the review as "ridiculous". This is perplexing because the review is a positive one & khchris(original) stated himself that really liked the new record & wrote in a thread the day before
http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/sho...?t=2199&page=2:



In his negative post, khchris(original) used the phrase "peaked my interest" & because he is such an egotistical blowhard, I (regretably now) made the comment that the word was "piqued" not "peaked" to try & burst his over-inflated bubble a bit. I often make perhaps irritating grammatical notes to other posts too, but I did deliberately take a confrontational tone with that particular correction; there just isn't too much about khchris(original) to like, as he is a cancer to this message board & has been for years. This caused him to lose it & hijack the thread as per his usual immflamatory khchris(original) bent.
Later in the http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=2025 review thread, khchris(original) megalomaniacally wrote:



I replied:
"Yes, please do a poll & find out how really unpopular you are. you're so delusional."

which perhaps wasn't the best choice of words, but I wrote what I wrote.
& that's all that was exchanged about a poll. As anyone can see, & as the very first reply from candymoan notes, there is no poll in this thread. Instead, very notewothy & telling is that when khchris(original) posted this "How psycho is Atari 2600?" thread, he started off the topic with an outright lie & misquotation of attributing words to me that I never wrote to lead the question to try & get his desired result:


I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again
No, no! - The Who

1. I criticized the review of the album, not the album. I even said that he probably is a nice guy, just the review was misrepresentational. You can like an album and hate a good review of the album. Sorry if this is "perplexing" to you, but it's not my fault if you're not educated enough to know the difference between this.

2. I made a comment on the review, not the person making the review. I did not make any comment directed towards anybody on my first comment, and I certainly did not make a comment on atari 2600 until he made a comment on me.

3. If anybody hijacked the thread, it was atari 2600 for talking trash about other people for absolutely no reason whatsoever that concerned him.


All you have to do is read the thread. It clearly shows me criticizing the review and the review only. I didn't even mention anyone and certainly did not mention atari 2600.

So why did atari 2600 choose to start a fight with me? Because he's a psychotic little boy, that's why.