View Single Post
Old 06.17.2008, 12:47 PM   #39
afterthefact
invito al cielo
 
afterthefact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 3,886
afterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's assesafterthefact kicks all y'all's asses
If you are asking what it seems like you are asking, and it seems like you are, then do you mean to say: What makes these songs that people have put a lot of heart and soul into (and let's face it, Chad Kroeger (sp?) probably does work hard on his songs, I doubt he could just pop them out one after another, otherwise he would) sound like crap to a lot of us, when songs that seemingly are just guys or girls having fun with their instruments, touching different wires together to see what noise they make, and being suprised by the end result just as much as we are sound great? Is it just the nature of the genesis of said music? Do we simply prefer knowing that the music was born of experimentation and improvisation, or is there more to it than that?
afterthefact is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|