|
I think Warhol's greatness is a largely academic one (similar to Duchamp). I too have never been moved by his work, but his contribution to post-war painting is almost impossible to underestimate. Personally, and I'm sure this would upset some here, I feel the same about a majority of Picasso's work, in so far as I never feel anything when I look at it, but would argue till I die that he's the greatest artist of the 20th Century.
Given trends in post-War art, it's difficult to judge much of it as an aesthetic experience in the way that we could easily do with someone like Monet or Van Gogh. The emerging era of conceptualism meant that artists were more likely valued for what they were saying 'about' art, than for the experience of the art work itself. The Abstract Expressionists in the '50s were perhaps the last group able to be judged solely on a pre-conceptual level (and even then, critics like Greenberg were doing their utmost to push the theory behind their work)
Which reminds me, I obviously should've included Pollock in my outrageously subjective list of post-war greats.
|