[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Cantankerous

i don't think you can percieve "now" in a literal sense, but rather only what happened a moment before. you can only percieve time as having passed. i don't know. it makes sense and i know what i'm trying to communicate but i can't seem to get it out how i'd like to.

oh the first part more or less makes sene but i dont agree.

i dont think reality requires interpretation-- quite the contrary-- it's the interpretation that takes you away from the direct experience of it.

and then again thought what does he mean by"reality"-- something outside our own perception of it? some hypothetical thing to which we have no access then? if that is the case, the issue of time passing is more or less irrelevant.