Thread: "Art" or abuse?
View Single Post
Old 10.22.2007, 01:40 PM   #12
fugazifan
invito al cielo
 
fugazifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,816
fugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's assesfugazifan kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by m1rr0r dash
chaining the dog is one thing... may make the dog sad, but starving it to death is cruel and reprehensible. that being said, i don't agree at all with the idea that it then ceases to be art. it irritates me quite a lot when i hear people say "my four year old could do that, that's not art." that might make it bad art, but art none the less. the piece shown above is cruel and disgusting art that should not be afforded any of the tolerance given to something like peeing on each other or on a crucifix. but it is still art.
i never said amything about whether its art or not, cause i dont really care if it is art or not. it very well may be art, but its sick. and shitty art. and he should still chain himself to a gallery and starve to death.
he still is a sick fuck, art or not
__________________
If there's been a way to build it,
There'll be a way to destroy it,
Things are not that out of control

www.myspace.com/dellilahtheband
www.myspace.com/lecirquedesvampiresmusic
fugazifan is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|