Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SpectralJulianIsNotDead
Well as someone pointed out, just because we have canines and have a genetic mutation that allows us to tolerate lactose much more than other mammals post-infancy doesn't mean we have to or that it is good for us.
I'm arguing reasoning, not the actual decision.
|
The argument that biology defines purpose is Aristotelian.
It also states that because women have wombs, all women should be breeding heterosexuals and that all sex should be for the purpose of procreation.
Obviously this is outdated and flawed logic. We have the free with to use or ignore our own biology.