[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Everyneurotic

that's exactly the attitude that allows all this to happen.

the problem is, we're using the lesser worse form of government thought of and started how many hundred years now?

the thing is, since people in power are too content with how bendable and corruptable democracy is, they haven't allowed any other thoughts of other government models to develope.

and one that sucks less is actually anarchy, when governement is not concentrated in one person; the two problems with anarchy is that it's only good for a transitional period and not as a definite form of government and that they had to spoil anarchy too and splinter it into a hundred and one formns of it derived from other forms of government (mostly, obsolete ones like democracy and comunism/socialism).

oh no no no. i didn't allow this to happen. i'm for participatory democracy and i've always participated when given a chance. i don't just sit there ignoring everything.

see with democracy you always have recourse-- with tyrannies you have none, unless you bend over to the will of the great tyrant. oh man you need to live under a dictatorship to fully appreciate democracy, flaws and all.

the problem with anarchy is that eventually it devolves into tyranny, because a power block develops & swallows it all. anarchies generally don't splinter-- if they do it's temporary until some kind of strongman takes over.

apathy is the problem. hands in pockets are the problem. doing nothing because "all is fucked up" is what allows this to happen.