|
I'm not really debating the labels; I think they're relatively "accurate." One issue is the definition of evolution - does that mean improved human functionality in a certain environment, a more developed technical intelligence, a more perceptive consciousness? The possibilities are limitless, and therefore, so are the "methods" of achieving it. Is evolution the "advancement" of the mind beyond the need for physical form? If so, then the superego as it's defined would take precedence. But one could argue for a more discernable consciousness (I realize "consciousness" seems a contradictory term in the context of this sentence, shut up) of the primal, which would give it over to the id.
Too much to wade through and discuss before coming to any conclusions. And, I've gone off on a tangent again, apologies.
|