View Single Post
Old 12.30.2006, 05:29 PM   #44
SpectralJulianIsNotDead
invito al cielo
 
SpectralJulianIsNotDead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,409
SpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glice
So you're saying that paedophiles should be allowed to work in primary schools, grooming children for their sick activities? You're fucked up dude.

Are you purposefully inferring random things from my sentence now to make me mad?

In a live or die, survival, situation, if you kill someone who is trying to kill you, you're not thinking "this guy has to pay for his crime against me," you're thinking, "if I don't kill him, he's gonna kill me."

In a courtroom, that isn't the case. There is no urgency and desperation- which is what normally drives a sane/normal nonkiller to kill.

The job of a judge is supposed to pass a penalty that will prevent the criminal from doing so again in a fair manner.

A judge is to take what means are necessary to prevent a pedophile from acting on the compulsion. Whether it is restricting his rights to be around little kids or putting him away for a long time or something else is up to the judge and the severity of the case (a child porn addict, a molestor, and a rapist should all have different sentences of course.)
SpectralJulianIsNotDead is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|