View Single Post
Old 11.08.2006, 03:36 PM   #45
PAULYBEE2656
invito al cielo
 
PAULYBEE2656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wexford, rep of ireland
Posts: 6,930
PAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's assesPAULYBEE2656 kicks all y'all's asses
i thought the arguement was the album was innovative not the band. the album was just a progression for the band........... just a project to keep em doing what they wanted to do. the arguement of innovativness coming from a band that made the bends is defunct cuz ok computer is the perfect bridging gap between the two.

radohead deseve respect for one thing. the constantly make good music, with absolutely no restrictions, pure 100% control of the output (like sy) and still can sell out stadiums and sell millions of albums worldwide with music that cannot be described as mainstream. the highlight onf all radiohead gigs is the obscure odd tracks, not the karmapolices or the fake plastic trees (even those songs are great) also they attract the most diverse range of folk to their gigs, everyone from kids, emo kjids, metal kids, indie kids to their parents to their parent to whomever............

maybe if digressed too far but i like radiohead a lot and make no excuses for it even if they did record pablo honey!!!

kid a is not innovative, its just damn good!
__________________
PAULYBEE2656 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|