Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Happy New Year Skuj, it’s good to know you’re alive and well!
Ummm......what in the hell are you talking about?
The percentage reported was clearly on each graph
—YES—
extremely early in the counting, but the numbers were true and correct and the point of sharing was President Trump had received more votes than the Top Three Democrats COMBINED!!!
Guess what, the same was 100% TRUE with over 99% of the polling locations counted:
You can read the Texas Tribune story for yourself.
Also, I posted about this a page or two later regarding the voting results in Texas.
If you can show where Charlie Kirk or The Texas Tribune got the numbers wrong, I’ll gladly share that information here at SYG. If not, guess you’d better stick your head back in the sand......or pop more popcorn! |
God help me. They puuuullled me back in.
Your initial graphic was showing the numbers at a time when 1.48% was reporting for red, and 0.76% were reporting for blue. Those numbers are RIGHT ON THE SLIDES. But then again, I'm talking to a racist, homophobic Magaman. WTF am I doing?
Turning to the general audience now......
Bernie is only 60 or so delegates behind, right? Has the media gone overboard with Joe's "success"? Isn't Trump on tape saying he fears Bernie the most? I don't buy this notion that Bernie as the nominee = another 4 years of numbnuts. I fear that Joe as the nominee could mean that.