Drumpf ocould easily win dancing with the stars

Colonel Sanders wins.

interesting, they are paring away at both edges-
SiriusXM issued the following statement:

SiriusXM encourages a diversity of discourse and opinion on our talk programs. However, comments recently made by a guest on the independently produced Glenn Beck Program, in our judgement, may be reasonably construed by some to have been advocating harm against an individual currently running for office, which we cannot and will not condone. For that reason, we have suspended The Glenn Beck Program from our Patriot channel for the coming week...

The suspension is in response to the interview Beck did with fiction author Brad Thor last Wednesday, in which Thor likened the GOP’s presumptive nominee Donald Trump to a South American-style dictator who would cause an “extinction-level event” for the country if elected. Thor then declared that in such a case, Congress would not be able to remove Trump from office by “legal means” through impeachment, so Thor asked “what patriot will step up and do that” if Trump oversteps his Constitutional restraints. Beck agreed with Thor’s assessment.
Here is the exchange:
THOR: He is a danger to America and I got to ask you a question and this is serious and this could ring down incredible heat on me because I’m about to suggest something very bad. It is a hypothetical I am going to ask as a thriller writer.
With the feckless, spineless Congress we have, who will stand in the way of Donald Trump overstepping his constitutional authority as President? If Congress won’t remove him from office, what patriot will step up and do that if, if, he oversteps his mandate as president, his constitutional-granted authority, I should say, as president.
If he oversteps that, how do we get him out of office? And I don’t think there is a legal means available. I think it will be a terrible, terrible position the American people will be in to get Trump out of office because you won’t be able to do it through Congress.


I've enjoyed a several of Thor's books, and from his US YES! attitude I am surprised he is so antiTrump. I don't think Beck is the player he used to be but still has a following that buys his baseball caps.

I was watching Fareed Zakaria GPS on Saturday and The Wall Street Journal's Bret Stephens was one of the panelists. This smug right-winger is usually pretty easy to hate, but when FZ asked him whether he'll vote for Trump, this is what he had to say:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKdfXqwUom0

AMEN. (Except for the "least left-wing" part, evidently). At least one "conservative" who doesn't roll over and horseshits around: "Ooohhh, I'm not quite there yet, I don't know Trump personally..." WHAT THE FUCK ELSE YOU PIECES OF SHIT NEED TO KNOW GODDAMMIT.

One of the good things under a Trump presidency might be an FCC that would allow Howard Stern back on terrestrial free FM.

If Bernie wins CA Tuesday, he will be our next President.

"Sanders is expected to return to his Vermont home on Wednesday and advisers say he intends to ramp up his courtship of the party's superdelegates, a process that is already underway, pointing to polls that show him faring better than Clinton in head-to-head matchups with Trump."

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...06-04-12-55-53

not really, the delegate math is impossible

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...a-dreamin.html

and, if you look at Sanders history, he is totally unelectable. Doesn't mean I don't like or respect the guy, but he has some very serious flaky shit in his background that would be exploited to the max by the rethug press, which would sink him to lower numbers than McGovern.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a..._a_my th.html

i been trying to tell folks this for a year now. Look, if folks want to support Bernie as a Nader 2.0 i totally respect that. I always supported Nader. But us Nader folks never believed he could win. Rather the Nade campaigns gave the non vote an opportunity for political participation. If folks want to support Bernie in that way, i respect that. But if folks think he is winning the primary they are being delusional.

i do not really get 2 party system to begin with. also (same story which goes for a long time), if it is a him or him or her, they are still answering to the same masters in the end (and if not, you're dead), so the choice given is like no choice. maybe Trump seems to be a bit outside of the corporate, but I do not think so. what I really do not understand is all this hatred on Trump rallies from left wing supporters. I am sure you have seen it. all the beating, kicking and spitting...and that should b democrats?...ok I understand the psychology of mass hysteria, but still. they seems to be more violent and againts first amendment then other side, which seems to be much more peaceful. how ironic is that. I am not saying I support republicans, it just something interesting I've noticed watching the "whole show" from the old continent.

there's a violence from the right wing that's a difficult thing to see clearly for some folks, it involves mass incarceration, joblessness, homelessness, poverty, lack of health and dental care, environmental racism, and the list is endless. It would be way worse under Trump.

You don't understand how people would react to bigoted and inflammatory rhetoric with anger and violence? Are you trolling us or nah?

I believe anything can happen at the conventions this year. We're in uncharted territory. Let these gangs keep attacking Americans who are participating in democracy. Have you seen the gang attacking the woman with Trump tshirt with eggs and spit? Has Hillary come out against this violence against women? You really have to see the pleasure this gang has while they attack the woman.

THE SLAVES DO ALL THE WORK, THE ROMANS ARE ALL UNEMPLOYED and THE NOBLES STOLE ALL THE WEALTH.

THE IMMIGRANTS DO ALL THE WORK, THE CITIZENS ARE ALL UNEMPLOYED and THE FINANCIERS STOLE ALL THE WEALTH.

recipes for disaster

So violence is a legitimate means of political expression? You're apologizing for children. "But the bad man called me a name!"

Actually, there probably are reasons in this world to get violent. Let's save our fiery ire for those issues. Meantime, this is embarrassing. There's really no excuse.

i didn't say anything of the sort. I said what the fuck do Trump supporters expect? That they can be uncivilized bastards and the people they abuse should be civil in retort?

In other words if Trump and his supporters are gong to use fighting words why should they be so surprised when it provokes a fight?

I am the surprised one. I expect more, but that's just because I sometimes stupidly forget that idiocy isn't just the property of the right. Lotta dumbfuck liberals, you must admit.

Meanwhile, I just found out Louis Farrakhan endorsed Trump. Can't wrap my head around that one, either.

While i don't think its in any way productive certainly its totally understandable that people would react the way they have. Its not a flaw in any political ideology, its not even stupid, its just human nature to respond with aggression with aggression. If you think Trump's words and particularly the words and actions of his supporters aren't aggressive you haven't been paying attention. Lets not pretend these incidents have been unprovoked and lets not pretend Trump crowd is innocent victims here.

Or what, does the "right" only like it when the "left" keeps turning the other cheek? Of course the racist bigots only want to see the other side act weak and submissive

It reminds me of when a kid runs up to the teacher saying "he hit me!" and when the teacher asks, "well what did you do?" and the kid says, "i didn't do anything" meanwhile the entire playground saw that kid totally provoking the fight by being a punk ass bully.

Bullies are always PUSSIES who flinch when their victims fight back and trump and his supporters are just a bunch of pussy ass bullies

Did you just call Louis Farrakhan a pussy ass bully?