Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonic Sounds (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   First 5 albums you owned/listened to and how old you were at the time (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=18651)

PAULYBEE2656 01.04.2008 06:12 AM

Dont Mess With Doctor Doom... Ooh Ooh Ooh Ow Ow

sarramkrop 01.04.2008 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nefeli
wow loved that song! all your list is awesome.
am trying to remember if they had a song with war word init..
porky, baby dee has hair like the woman of thompson twins and honestly the other night, i saw a boy with hair almost like kershaw..that was a suprise.
(wait. i ll dedicate an offtopic song to yous. one of my alltime favourates)


This one?
 

 

 

Rob Instigator 01.04.2008 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Everyneurotic
gee, what an authority just zinged me. ouch.


frank sinatra was not pop, he was tremendously popular but his shit ranged from swing to jazz to r&b.

and you say you hate pop but you like sebadoh, therefore you think sebadoh is rock...hmmm, i don't see much "rock" in playing kumbaya acoustic guitars while singing out of tune.

seriously, you think sebadoh rocks? they have like three punkish songs, compared to 5000 too stoned to croak hippie bullshit songs.

and the beatles, well, john wrote imagine and woman, besides recording a whole album of sixties POP songs with phil "girl group" spector.


sinatra was a crooner, a standards singer, who sang a variety fo songs, but he was a complete and total popular music singer. he was NOT a jazz singer, and he was NOT an R&B singer

sebadoh - listen to smash yr head on the punk rock, harmacy, bakesale, bubble & scrape and tell me that gloriously noisy shit ain't rock man.

as for your Lennon comment, the songs you mention were written after the beatles broke up, so they count nothing towards what I said about John rocking the Beatles. and his Spector produced album was ROCK SONGS man! Buddy Holly? Chuck Berry covers? How can you be so ignorant as to call that pop?

sarramkrop 01.04.2008 10:31 AM

War war is stupid
And people are stupid
And love means nothing
In some strange quarters

gmku 01.04.2008 10:41 AM

We're an American band
We'll come into your town
We'll help you party it down...

Rob Instigator 01.04.2008 10:45 AM

when there's lightning
you know it always brings me down
cuz it's free and I see that it's me
who is lost and never found.

gmku 01.04.2008 10:47 AM

Sly old slaver know he's doing all right,
You should-a heard him just around midnight...

Glice 01.04.2008 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norma J
Pavement have made some great Pop songs.

I partially read a book once where it studied Theodor Adorno's concept of Pop music. The opposite of Pop music being 'Serious Music', as he put it. Pop, being 'popular' (obviously), but in the sense of 'popular song structure'. There's a set structure that a song can be established upon that can be classified as Pop, or a Pop song. Where as serious music, would be, say, Sonic Youth. A band that follow their subconcious, if you want, who have no set structure, or a structure that doesn't necessarly follow a popular foundation anyway.


I'm going to disagree with this, for a few reasons - mostly around the ambit of what Adorno understood by the avant-garde (which still holds true today) and what the lay (i.e., wrong) conception of the avant-garde is. The avant-garde is not synonymous with 'serious' music, but it's often the easiest way to understand it (although I'm pretty sure Adorno had quarrels with 'radicalism').

1. Sonic Youth have conventional song structures. They may bend and distort the shape of a pop/rock song, elongate passages, use 'unconventional' (in and only in the rock context) melodic ideas, but they invariably return to what is, if we don't want to say 'pop', a conventional song-structure.

2. Adorno, and I, would say that a conventional song-structure is not the same as serious music.

3. Adorno hated jazz for its consecration of various compositional rules and its use of improvisation. Sonic Youth, if they ever aspire to move away from pop/rock (whether they succeed or not), would aspire to jazz over classical (i.e., they err towards improvisational rather than compositional forms).

4. Adorno couldn't abide Stravinsky. I forget precisely what he said about Stravinsky, but I seem to recall it revolved around Stravinsky's 'patchworking' of art, as opposed to Schoenberg's more 'complete' serialism; whatever the case, if Stravinsky isn't considered 'serious' by Adorno, you can bet your white ass that SY won't be.

These are all minor points, and I'd like to point out that Adorno is probably my most loathéd of Cultural Theorists; however, while I disagree with a lot of what he says, and I think it's not a very necessary distinction to make, within the context of 'rock/pop' vs 'serious' music, SY definitely sit on the side of the former. The point being that if you wish to make the distinction, you're more than welcome to, but be careful with it. By way of analogy, while the Beatles had a great many melodic inventions and [faux-]compositional ideas, they are only 'radical' or avant-garde within the context of rock music. Outside of this context, which is to say, insofar as Western 'classical' (in its broadest sense) music endeavours to encompass, or formalise, musical notation totally, rock music has very, very few inventions which fall outside of the initial remit of the Romantic era of music, let alone those of the Neo-Classicism, the first/ second 'avant-garde' or the more recent movements of musique concrete, stochasticism or spectralism. Electricity & volume, I'm afraid, don't cut the mustard.

Yeah. These are all words, all of them.

Glice 01.04.2008 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norma J
synthetic.


I don't want you to think that I'm picking on you, but this oft-aspired to notion of 'authenticity' within the sonic-realm of 'rock' music confuses me for the simple reason that anything amplified or, following a great deal of the studio inventions of the 40s (in the Cageian narrative) or early 60s (in the pop/rock narrative), recorded is, in some respects 'synthetic' insofar as it is not 'as the instrument truly sounds'. By this I mean that 'synthetic' or 'authentic' are essentially non-sequiters of an identity-ism that blights the auspices of the 'truth' narrative to which such arguments aspire/ rely upon.

Glice 01.04.2008 01:13 PM

God, I'm talking a world of shite this evening. The first tape I bought was a Bros one, by the way. When will I be famous, seeing as you asked.

gmku 01.04.2008 01:27 PM

Uh, yeah, whenever I start seeing words like "sonic-realm" and "identity-ism"... I know I've just got to ask that person when he's going to be famous.

Everyneurotic 01.04.2008 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
sinatra was a crooner, a standards singer, who sang a variety fo songs, but he was a complete and total popular music singer. he was NOT a jazz singer, and he was NOT an R&B singer

sebadoh - listen to smash yr head on the punk rock, harmacy, bakesale, bubble & scrape and tell me that gloriously noisy shit ain't rock man.

as for your Lennon comment, the songs you mention were written after the beatles broke up, so they count nothing towards what I said about John rocking the Beatles. and his Spector produced album was ROCK SONGS man! Buddy Holly? Chuck Berry covers? How can you be so ignorant as to call that pop?


sinatra SANG jazz and r&b songs, he wasn't an jazz or r&b singer.

i've listened to all of them, it ranges from subpar dino jr to hippie bullshit. just because lou doesn't give a fuck about singing in tune doesn't mean it rocks.

my point of mentioning those songs was that, since they were written for his solo albums, it was undeniable that he had a huge pop sensitivity.

besides, chuck berry was pop and so was buddy holly, they sold millions of albums and were constantly on the radio, wrote singles and had catchy choruses.

Rob Instigator 01.04.2008 01:36 PM

chuck berry and buddy holly were POPular, but most definitely NOT pop music. chuck berry is ROCK N ROLL personified.
Buddy Holly was rock and country, rockabilly personified.

lik I said, different definion of "pop"

gmku 01.04.2008 01:37 PM

At this point, I'd like to request a group hug.

Rob Instigator 01.04.2008 01:41 PM

chuck berry is GOD

gmku 01.04.2008 01:46 PM

Then God is an asshole.

Glice 01.04.2008 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gmku
At this point, I'd like to request a group hug.


I'm always up for some of that. Seconded!

Rob Instigator 01.04.2008 01:53 PM

OF COURSE God is an asshole! Have you looked at the world around you ever in yr life man???????? ;)

gmku 01.04.2008 02:17 PM

Yes, I have, but I thought I was living in a world without God.

Rob Instigator 01.04.2008 02:32 PM

you are.

Kina 01.04.2008 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarramkrop
I remember Tumbleweed too. Interesting seeing them mentioned here.


Awesome, I had no idea they were known outside of the Australian local scene, just out of curiosity where did you hear about them?

Kina 01.04.2008 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nefeli
personally, i cannot relate to dissing a whole genre of music. have had (like Kina said) my pop dissing periods when i was young, but mostly regarding specific artists. some i started to like when MATURED (<-- irony), some i still dont like like whitney houston, or mariah carrey -although i loved some remixes i heared and that made me change a bit my mind on her.
its different when you grow up along with pop music of your time. easier to like some songs, but the opposite takes place too. for example i hated pump up the volume when it was a hit, after some time passed by, i loved it.
glice asked about embarrassing. i remember yesterday that had got a reo speedwagon record. but as have stated many times here, i dont related to embarrassing or guilty pleasures. i relate to feeling guilty for not exploring world music for example.
you can have music you like and enjoy and music that does all that along with fullfiling you. i dont see any problem with that. on the contrary.
i happy that can play daft punk and digitalism or my other love depeche mode. but ok, i dont buy or listen to contemporary pop. it doesnt mean that i cant enjoy it when its played around me.
the 5 first records dont feel them as representing much, for me at least. nor genetics played a role for obssesed love for music in my case (or my brother's, even if he listens to whole different kind of music). my parents were listening to music, classical, disco and they taught me of beatles for example, but i dont think they were ever obssesed with music.
backround..am not sure. it helps i guess, it can be limiting too. i was listening to whole different bands that really loved at the time and when i first listened to telescopes-taste and then to sonic youth, i thought that this is the sounds i was always looking for. been having that feeling a lot past years and am happy for this.
sorry that this was long, and repetative. plus hate when phonecalls interrupt me. i lose track of what wanted to say.
i think limiting yourself and being absolute, you are missing things in music, in life in general.

ps! the only time i felt "guilty" was when i read that jim o' rourke hated "the the". havent yet fully overcome this, but i ll live.


you are right. (i always hated the term noise)


There's some stuff from the 80s that I would have just considered as normal and wouldn't have thought was fun at the time but when they play now has '80s groovy' & funny appeal to me when I hear it played somewhere, like MC Hammer or something, just cause it's something that brings back memories of the decade and because that style isn't done anymore now but it was seen as really funky back then. But yeah Mariah Carey will never have that appeal!

Kina 01.04.2008 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAULYBEE2656
kids these days have it soo easy... my first albums were probably these....


 

age about 5 or 6


 

i was too young to actually get the john foxx era


 

sorry, still a classic!


Boney M! My parents had a tape of theirs and played it the whole time on a car trip to Switzerland from Croatia and back when I was 4! It still brings me nightmares just in a 'had to listen to it for days on end' kind of thing!

And Duran Duran are great!

andrei 01.05.2008 05:16 AM

The first album i've bought with my money (oh well, with my mother's money) was a Michael Jackson bootleg cassette. It was some kind of bootleg single with xeroxed covers and typewrittered fictional tracklist. In fact it was just one song repeated for 30 minutes on one side and another repetead for 30 minutes on second side. I remember i was very dissapointed.

The second one was a bootleg copy cassette of Queen's Innuendo which i've bought as a replacement of Dr. Alban's Look Who's Talking which i've never found (Thank God :D). I still have the cover from this cassette. It was a RACKS blank (a very common cassette brand name those days in my country), with hand-written songs (how could i have payed for something like that :| )

The next one i remember (i still have it) was Megadeth's Countdown To Extinction. It was some kind of x-mas present. Some relative (my aunt as far as i remember) gave me and my brother money to buy some cassettes from the local store as a x-mas gift. I bought Megadeth's album (cause i liked the cover) and my brother bought Metallica's Black Album (which by the way, had a red cover, with a metallica picture glued on it)

After that, because i really liked Metallica's album and i couldn't find any other Megadeath album i've bought Metallica's ...And Justice For All (which i've enjoyed for a long time). Sadly i don't have the cassette no more...

In 1994 my father taped for me Nirvana's Unplugged performance, at the end of a Basic Instinct VHS tape. I still have the VHS, but my VHS player gone in flames and i haven't replaced it. After that i've bought Nirvana's In Utero on cassette which i've recorded Nevermind over, cause my father bought me from Tokyo other more good-looking version.

PAULYBEE2656 01.06.2008 07:32 AM

i still say, you kids have it too easy these days!!!

UVRAY 01.06.2008 08:36 AM

I previously owned albums but the first 5 albums I saved up for and bought with my own money began when I was 12 in 1979:

The very first I bought was Parallel Lines by Blondie.

And then:

The Pleasure Principle - Gary Numan.

Kings Of The Wild Frontier - Adam & The Ants.

Destroyer - Kiss.

Ziggy Stardust & The Spiders From Mars - David Bowie.

Bertrand 01.07.2008 08:24 AM

I was probably 13 when I bought Jacques Dutronc's Double Disque d'Or in a supermarket, for I had liked his scopitones on television. A double album was attractive cause it contained more music. So there.

Next one was another compilation, by the Kinks, titled Collection, with a wonderful cover.

Then I dived into music that had been recorded less than 15 years before my buying the record, and got that Duran Duran record portrayed above, plus Seven & the Ragged Tiger - which I couldn't listened to these days.

After those, it's quite blurred, my guess is some Nina Hagen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gmku
So do you think our first five albums were formative somehow, shaping what we'd like to listen to, collect the rest of our lives? Any theories? Environment? Genetics? A combination of both?


I've regularly got back to the Kinks.
Mostly when my later records began sounding disappointing.
Then I try to move on to things related to the Davies brothers - artists who would have covered a few of their songs, leading me to British garage rock, and expanding from there (the way I expanded my love for Sonic Youth buyig Dino Jr, Pussy Galore and so on... til the mid 90s).

_slavo_ 01.07.2008 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAULYBEE2656
i still say, you kids have it too easy these days!!!


That's more than right, my man. I remember my older brother copying smuggled Depeche mode LPs from Germany (it was still communism here in the 80s!) over and over all around the city, so that the 1000th copy got almost inaudible.

Now it's all just click and order it/download it. No passion involved.

Rob Instigator 01.07.2008 10:12 AM

the 6th album I bougth was KISS's DESTROYER

man I was into kiss when I was pre-teen

UVRAY 01.07.2008 12:37 PM

>> I was probably 13 when I bought Jacques Dutronc's Double Disque d'Or <<

Very underrated French pop artist.

Pleased and surprised to see him mentioned. His Et Moi Et Moi Et Moi single remains a 60's classic.

uhler 01.07.2008 11:47 PM

green day- dookie
offspring- smash
rancid- lets go
pennywise- about time
fugazi- repeater

i bought those five around the same time in 1995 (i was 13). i hated music until i heard green day a few months beforehand. i still have dookie but i never listen to it and fugazi turned out to be one of my favorite bands.

Everyneurotic 01.08.2008 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrei
...
The next one i remember (i still have it) was Megadeth's Countdown To Extinction. It was some kind of x-mas present. Some relative (my aunt as far as i remember) gave me and my brother money to buy some cassettes from the local store as a x-mas gift. I bought Megadeth's album (cause i liked the cover) and my brother bought Metallica's Black Album (which by the way, had a red cover, with a metallica picture glued on it)
...


my black album tape was purple-ish and had a snake drawn over and some bold rub-on letters spelling "metallica", both in bright white.

PAULYBEE2656 01.11.2008 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uhler
....i hated music until i heard green day a few months beforehand......


most people love music until they hear green day!

uhler 01.11.2008 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAULYBEE2656
most people love music until they hear green day!


well i hated it until the age of 12/13. i did love nintendo music though. kids would ask what kind of music i liked and i would only say mario brothers.

PAULYBEE2656 01.12.2008 05:42 AM

man, u should check out dj scotch egg then....
 

SCOTCH WEB


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth