cryptowonderedruginvogue ran into me and I was so stoned
the movie was very funny!

Hi pedro!

I think Thom Yorke wrote the song that plays during the credits.

the song during the crdits was the most boring part! ha ha ha!

just kidding! Just a thom yorkshire pudding rip!

watch the first 24 minutes here:
http://media.filmforce.ign.com/media...07/vids_1.html

man i dont know
but the movie was awesomeeeee
i couldnt stop laughing at some of the shit they would talk about

hola rob!

I don't know why so many people hate the rotoscope animation for this movie. I think it's really interesting. No one does this sort of thing except for Richard Linklater. It looks good.

And the dudes who made the rotoscoped Lord of the Rings in the 70's...

Anyway, this looks pretty good despite me not being entirely convinced by Linklater. It'll be a candidate for best PKD adaptation I imagine but then most of them have been pretty poor bar Blade Runner.

& before that Hitchcock used rotoscoping for "The Birds" & before that, it was (I believe) first used for the Max & Dave Fleischer Adventures of Superman cartoons in the forties.
I actually bought a DVD of 15 of the 17 total episodes of the show at a dollar store.
Bryan Singer found inspiration in these animated adventures for how he wanted flight to appear in the new Superman Returns movie.

I loved the look (& most of the content) of Waking Life & I'm sure I'll love this movie too.

this is a different kind of animation from the old lord of the rings though. that was hand drawn over film, while this is recorded entirely in digital and run thorugh a processor, a program, to turn that digital image into an amination, like a filter on photoshop. it loks very rich and detailed and adds something off kilter which fits in directly with phillip k dick's work and mindset.

same concept...better technology

Just like Waking Life, A Scanner Darkly was shot with a digital camera & then each frame is worked on with a MacIntosh.

for Waking Life, Linklater employed a team of artists. Each artist was assigned to one portion of the film & that's why it has slightly different stylistic looks at different times.

Yeah, it's still rotoscoping. A process which seems like a lazy way to do animation basically. But it does look quite pleasing. I don't think I have actually sat through a full rotoscoped film yet though. Haven't seen Waking Life and godknows that LOTR film was pretty painful.

Those Fleischer Superman cartoons are pretty great if for the animation alone. It's basically the same plot over and over again but they look nice. Singer should have dug deep for some more inspiration because Superman Returns was pretty damn weak.

CulturePulp 54: The Richard Linklater Interview (done-up comic book style)

http://homepage.mac.com/merussell/ib...411/index.html

I watched it and liked it. I didn't think I'd be able to get past the rotoscoping, but it didn't bother me.

My sister is so dumb. We were in the theater watching it, and she leans over and says "That red stuff is substance D right?". I just laughed.

I just finished the book. Im looking forward to the movie.
Anyone have any idea what book of his I should read next?

Your a Superman fan also?

I saw A Scanner Darkly last week and bought the book yesturday, I'm excited to start reading it.

Cool!
Good Times!

haha

My goal is to get you guys to go to the Rothko Chapel. Not to get married, but to meditate and look at art. School this kid, ya know? I've never been, although I did live in Dallas during the summer of '89. I make my own periodic pilgramages (have been since '88...now I'm closer) to the National Gallery Modern Wing in D.C (by I.M. Pei) to sit in the Rothko room. Oh, and once I got to see Family of Saltimbaques and The Old Man and the Guitar Picassos there while on tour.

good times indeed

ive read the man in the high castle and radio free albemuth and ASD, all three are incredible! i might have liked RFA the best, but all of his stuff is brilliant. plus RFA is where sonic took a lot of stuff for the sister album. next on my list for PKD books is flow my tears, the policeman said, then valis.
and the ASD movie was great, i understood the end better in the movie than the book. ,aybe im just dumb...

That's because so many people on here, and elsewhere, have missed the point of the animation! Sure, it would suck in a different movie, but it's essential to what Linkletter did here. He's capturing the crazy hallucinagenic experience of one of PKD's most overt drug paranoia tales! Which is saying a lot, as all of his books have some thread of that going through them, but here, it's the whole experience. Everything the characters are seeing all of the time is completely distorted by drugs and technology (in the case of the scamble suits, but also the monitoring devices), so this medium was perfect to capture their experience.

Plus, with animation, you can put expressions on Reeve's face, which leads him to suddenly be completely convincing as somebody besides himself for once. Though Woody totally steels the show.

It SUCKED.

Absolutely.

I like the radio shows, the early movie serials, the Fleischer cartoons, and the TV series quite a bit. I've never watched Smallville though.

The Reeve movies were okay. The new one was cool for the effects, I guess. Kate Bosworth as Lois Lane was horrible.

I like Batman and Spider-Man more than Superman though.

The Justice League (& Justice League Unlimited) Cartoon Network series are very good. The new saturday morning Superman (The Legion of Superheroes) & Batman (The Batman) animated series are each not too bad. The Batman:The Animated Series (won lots of Emmys and Mark Hamill is the shit as The Joker) and Superman cartoons from the nineties are fantastic.

Contrary to your opinion, 2006 was a great year for movies and, in my own opinion, A Scanner Darkly was in the top ten.

I was disappointed some by the somewhat predictable ending, but damn, it's a very good movie still and a nice companion to the book.

To each their own, but man...

Virtually devoid of a plot (and what plot there was was extremely cliche and quite predictable). Actors in it giving some of their worst performances ever (except, strangely, Keanu who -- while asleep at the wheel as usual -- actually delivered a convincing role). Cliche cliche boring cliche cliche. A Scanner Darkly was pretty worthless, cept for the gimmicky (but pretty!) rotoscoping. Take that part away from it and watch the film for what it was and go, "oh, it's this really plotless pointless film." It has its hook -- every film needs a hook, i GUESS -- but man... longest 100 minutes I've seen in a LONG time.

Looks good, sounds good, but secretly sucks. Yeah... Good soundtrack!

Waking Life did more with the effect. On that one, Linklater had several different graphic artists (or teams) with different styles for each of the sections.

Agreed.

Hell yes.
Pure style, great writing. I collected toys from the Batman one. Beautiful.
I will admit to really liking Smallville. It's the WB'inest thing I have ever liked, and as teenagery as it gets, but I love it.

I actually have all the Batman: the Animated series dvd's.. only dvd tv shows I own besides ren and stimpy. shit was boss.

I don't really agree on that point. I liked Waking Life, but it was so whimsical compared to ASD. The effect works for either concept - a dream like surreality, or a paranoid drug-addled hallucination fest - however it seemed more focused to me in ASD. But then, the whole technology had aged considerably between the two movies, and Linkletter took years longer than anticipated to pull it off in ASD. Waking Life felt more like a cartoon to me, while ASD felt like a hallucinatory reality.

Well, it wouldn't have really made much sense to present different styles of digital overpainting with A Scanner Darkly...except in parts, and it would have only made it more confusing for some audiences if the same method had been employed.

To clarify, I wasn't remarking that A Scanner Darkly should have been graphically more like Waking Life.

Sure, you're saying "did more" = "more variation". I can accept that. I just think "did more" usually means "more effective", which for me would definitely be the latter film.

i saw it a while ago and thought it was really good.

this was the worst piece of shit ive seen in a looong time. actually made the book seem good by comparison.

Just saw it today. Good movie. Really good.

I love the book but really couldn't get into the film. I didn't have a problem with the animation or Keanu Reeves but the way in which whole chunks of it played like some kind of stoner comedy. The scene at the beginning, with the guy showering and imagining being covered in bugs, set the tone of the whole movie. In the book it's genuinely creepy but in the film it's like an out-take from the Fear and Loathing movie - which I also disliked.

I'm a fan. It's terrific.

i thought it was an awesome film
i actually thought it might be cool if the Cobain film was done in this style, Linklater captured bing on drugs so well aswell as capturing the 70s so well in dazed and confused.

I that stuff helped make Keanu's character more tragic.

the animated batman series totally pwned!!!...mark hamill, and then dana delaney with her uber-babe voice in the movie...so good....

i like a scanner darkly....i think i need to see it again to see if it was a fluke...but the changing suit things that they had on looked amazing...and robert downey was in fine form as usual...ah i guess i did like it.